Adult age and gender differences in perceptions of facial attractiveness: beauty is in the eye of the older beholder
Abstract
The authors examined ratings of facial attractiveness, rankings of faces and reasons given by young, middle-aged, and older men and women for young, middle-aged, and older male and female face attractiveness. No support for predictions derived from similarity, interest, and cohort hypotheses was obtained. In support of the expertise hypothesis, young and middle-aged adults rated younger faces as more attractive than old faces, whereas older adults rated all aged faces equally. In support of the crone hypothesis, older female faces were rated the lowest of all faces. Theoretical implications and real-world applications are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rater's age does not exhibit a significant correlation with perceived attractiveness.
“Conversely, the rater’s age (β5) does not exhibit a significant correlation with perceived attractiveness, which is aligned with previous research [67,68] and in contradiction with what other authors have reported [69].”
From What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters (2024) · cites this paper as [69]
Cites
Age and the perception of age and attractiveness
Wernick, M., & Manaster, G. J. (1984) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/24.4.408 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters
Gulati, A., Martínez-Garcia, M., Fernández, D., Lozano, M. A., Lepri, B., & Oliver, N. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.240882 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Foos, P. W., & Clark, M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- Queens University of Charlotte (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Genetic Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-04-29
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 162-175
- ISSN
- 0022-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-0896
- OpenAlex
- W2135023108
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Genetic Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- facial attractiveness, age differences, gender differences, similarity hypothesis, face perception, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Beauty, Face, Female, Humans, Individuality, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Prejudice, Sex Characteristics, Cohort Studies, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review