Cited by 143Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace Recognition and PerceptionAging and Gerontology Research

Adult age and gender differences in perceptions of facial attractiveness: beauty is in the eye of the older beholder

Foos, Paul W., Clark, M. Cherie·2011·The Journal of Genetic Psychology

Abstract

The authors examined ratings of facial attractiveness, rankings of faces and reasons given by young, middle-aged, and older men and women for young, middle-aged, and older male and female face attractiveness. No support for predictions derived from similarity, interest, and cohort hypotheses was obtained. In support of the expertise hypothesis, young and middle-aged adults rated younger faces as more attractive than old faces, whereas older adults rated all aged faces equally. In support of the crone hypothesis, older female faces were rated the lowest of all faces. Theoretical implications and real-world applications are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00221325.2010.526154

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rater's age does not exhibit a significant correlation with perceived attractiveness.

    “Conversely, the rater’s age (β5) does not exhibit a significant correlation with perceived attractiveness, which is aligned with previous research [67,68] and in contradiction with what other authors have reported [69].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foos, P. W., & Clark, M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
  • Queens University of Charlotte (US)
Venue
The Journal of Genetic Psychology
Published
2011-04-29
Volume
172
Issue
2
Pages
162-175
ISSN
  • 0022-1325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0896
OpenAlex
W2135023108
Cited by
143
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Genetic Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
facial attractiveness, age differences, gender differences, similarity hypothesis, face perception, older adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Beauty, Face, Female, Humans, Individuality, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Prejudice, Sex Characteristics, Cohort Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review