The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Learning from Mount St. Helens: Catastrophic Events as Educational Opportunities
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Local teachers recognized the high-profile nature of Mount St. Helens geological events and were the first to build curricula (Anderson 1987; Mark Watrin, Science Coordinator for the Battle Ground School District and state-level Science Teaching Coordinator for Southwest Washington, oral communication 2021).”
From Development of a volcanic risk management system at Mount St. Helens—1980 to present (2023) · cites this paper as Anderson 1987
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Anderson J., 1981, Mount St. Helens: One Year Later, 181
- Burton I., 1964, Natural Resources Journal, 3, 412
- Burton I., 1978, The Environment as Hazard
- Hewitt K., 1971, The Hazardousness of a Place: A Regional Ecology of Damaging Events
- Nakano T., 1974, Natural Hazards: Local, National, Global, 231
- Quinn R., 1981, Mount St Helens: One Year Later, 71
- Saarinen T. F., 1985, Warning and Response to the Mount St. Helens Eruption
- Warrick R. A., 1981, Four Communities Under Ash: After Mount St. Helens
- White G. F., 1975, Assessment of Research on Natural Hazards
Cited by
Development of a volcanic risk management system at Mount St. Helens—1980 to present
Wright, H. M. N., Driedger, C. L., Pallister, J. S., Newhall, C. G., Clynne, M. A., & Ewert, J. W. (2023) · Bulletin of Volcanology · doi:10.1007/s00445-023-01663-y · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geography
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1987-09
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 229-233
- ISSN
- 0022-1341
- 1752-6868
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning from Mount St. Helens: Catastrophic Events as Educational Opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00221348708979491
- The paper
- Anderson, J. (1987). Learning from Mount St. Helens: Catastrophic Events as Educational Opportunities. Journal of Geography. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221348708979491
