The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development
Abstract
"Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development." The Journal of Higher Education, 34(7), pp. 413–414
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique.
Amabile, T. M. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997 · Cited by 2,278
A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity
Feist, G. J. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5 · Cited by 2,180
Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation.
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27 · Cited by 1,766
Differential contributions of majority and minority influence.
Nemeth, C. J. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.1.23 · Cited by 1,254
Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success
Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.52.3.443 · Cited by 1,252
Metadata
- Authors
- Feibleman, J. K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1963-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 413-414
- ISSN
- 0022-1546 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4640
- OpenAlex
- W2083323045
- Cited by
- 668
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00221546.1963.11774835
- The paper
- Feibleman, J. K. (1963). Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development. The Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1963.11774835
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
