The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Activity Involvement and Place Attachment on Recreationists' Perceptions of Setting Density
Abstract
Research examining recreationists' perceptions of setting density in outdoor recreation contexts has illustrated the influence of a number of factors. In this investigation we examined the effect of activity involvement and place attachment on hikers' perceptions of setting density using frameworks offered by social judgment and cognitive development theories. We hypothesized that respondents' perceptions of setting density would involve cognitive evaluations where the condition encountered is compared against the individual's personal standard for that specific context. Additionally, past work operating within this framework has suggested that the activation of ego-attitudes amplifies the processes of assimilation and contrast such that disparate conditions are contrasted and conditions consistent with the respondents' position are assimilated and considered acceptable. The extent to which respondents' ego-attitudes were activated was measured using the activity involvement and place attachment constructs. Past research has also shown that activity involvement and place attachment are correlates of past experience which acts to shift the evaluative standard toward positions previously encountered. Data were collected from 1,561 hikers over the summer and fall of 1999. These results indicated that only place identity and place dependence were significant predictors of respondents' perceptions of setting density. While respondents scoring high on the place identity dimension were more inclined to report feeling crowded, respondents scoring high on the place dependence dimension were inclined to evaluate setting density more favorably. Theoretical implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications
Cortina, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 · Cited by 8,810 · cited 1×
“70 are acceptable, Cortina (1983) has indicated that in scales with a reduced number of items (e.”
BackgroundThe role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes
Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209158 · Cited by 2,070
Cited by
Delighted or Satisfied? Positive Emotional Responses Derived from Theme Park Experiences
Ma, J., Scott, N., Gao, J., & Ding, P. (2017) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2015.1125824 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Leisure Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-231
- ISSN
- 0022-2216 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-6417
- OpenAlex
- W185381766
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Activity Involvement and Place Attachment on Recreationists' Perceptions of Setting Density. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00222216.2004.11950020
- The paper
- Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2004). Effect of Activity Involvement and Place Attachment on Recreationists' Perceptions of Setting Density. Journal of Leisure Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2004.11950020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.