The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Once More on the Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis (λ Model) for Motor Control
Abstract
The equilibrium control hypothesis (lambda model) is considered with special reference to the following concepts: (a) the length-force invariant characteristic (IC) of the muscle together with central and reflex systems subserving its activity; (b) the tonic stretch reflex threshold (lambda) as an independent measure of central commands descending to alpha and gamma motoneurons; (c) the equilibrium point, defined in terms of lambda, IC and static load characteristics, which is associated with the notion that posture and movement are controlled by a single mechanism; and (d) the muscle activation area (a reformulation of the "size principle")--the area of kinematic and command variables in which a rank-ordered recruitment of motor units takes place. The model is used for the interpretation of various motor phenomena, particularly electromyographic patterns. The stretch reflex in the lambda model has no mechanism to follow-up a certain muscle length prescribed by central commands. Rather, its task is to bring the system to an equilibrium, load-dependent position. Another currently popular version defines the equilibrium point concept in terms of alpha motoneuron activity alone (the alpha model). Although the model imitates (as does the lambda model) spring-like properties of motor performance, it nevertheless is inconsistent with a substantial data base on intact motor control. An analysis of alpha models, including their treatment of motor performance in deafferented animals, reveals that they suffer from grave shortcomings. It is concluded that parameterization of the stretch reflex is a basis for intact motor control. Muscle deafferentation impairs this graceful mechanism though it does not remove the possibility of movement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle
Rack, P. M. H., & Westbury, D. R. (1969) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008923 · Cited by 1,144
The mechanics of human saccadic eye movement
Robinson, D. A. (1964) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007485 · Cited by 893
Cited by
The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception
Grush, R. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000093 · Cited by 1,387
Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom
Gottlieb, G. L., Corcos, D. M., & Agarwal, G. C. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00048238 · Cited by 632
Joint stiffness: Myth or reality?
Latash, M. L., & Zatsiorsky, V. M. (1993) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/0167-9457(93)90010-m · Cited by 522
Speech Production as State Feedback Control
Houde, J. F., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2011) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00082 · Cited by 463
The contribution of muscle properties in the control of explosive movements
van Soest, A. J., & Bobbert, M. F. (1993) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00198959 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Feldman, A. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Motor Behavior
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1986-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-54
- ISSN
- 0022-2895 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1027
- OpenAlex
- W1981815942
- Cited by
- 1,279
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Once More on the Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis (λ Model) for Motor Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00222895.1986.10735369
- The paper
- Feldman, A. G. (1986). Once More on the Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis (λ Model) for Motor Control. Journal of Motor Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1986.10735369
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.