The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary aspects of tail shedding in lizards and their relatives
Abstract
Summary The ability to shed (autotomize) all or part of the tail, usually in response to predator attack, and often to subsequently regenerate it is widespread in lizards and amphisbaenians and also occurs in a few snakes and in the tuatara. Most species possess a sophisticated intravertebral autotomy mechanism which seems to be primitive in the Squamata. This appears to have been independently lost in members of many groups, but some agamids and snakes have regained the ability to shed their tails by a simpler intervertebral means and a number of agamids have also redeveloped tail regeneration as well. Breakable tails are used to evade capture in two main ways: by enabling reptiles to break away from predators that have grasped them by the tail and by providing a distraction which deflects the attention of the attacker away from the vulnerable head and body. It is argued that loss of caudal autotomy has occurred when the costs of tail shedding outweigh its benefits. Likely costs include the expense of regrowing the tail and the loss of a variety of possible tail functions that may cause partial incapacitation, at least until the tail regenerates. Benefits of autotomy are liable to be low if predation is rare, if the animal is able to protect itself effectively in other ways, if it is too slow to evade further pursuit after the tail is shed, or if the tail is small or unpalatable and consequently not likely to distract a predator. Benefit variation may well be greater than cost variation and therefore more important in initiating the loss of autotomy mechanisms. Many taxa that do not shed the tail appear to conform to the above interpretation, but in some cases, such as the Platynota, Agamidae and Chamaeleonidae, lack of intravertebral autotomy may reflect the history of these groups rather than being a direct result of present ecological pressures. The distribution of intervertebral autotomy in the Agamidae suggests that it may have evolved only in rather special circumstances where tail fragility is advantageous even in the absence of the ability to regenerate. Restriction of autotomy planes to the tail-base, so that the whole organ is lost, a condition found in a number of relatively slow-moving geckoes, is interpreted as a means of ensuring that enough of the tail is shed to distract a predator from further pursuit. The stimulus necessary to induce autotomy can vary rapidly in individual lizards and at least some of these changes probably maximize the effectiveness of the tail-shedding mechanism. Differences in the readiness with which all or part of the tail is shed exist between species and are likely to reflect the balance of costs and benefits in particular cases. Variations in incidence of broken tails between species and populations may be due to such differences in fragility but many other factors may play a part, including the age structure of samples, incidence of unsuccessful attacks by predators and ability to evade predators after autotomy. There is a clear tendency for climbing lizards, especially those living on rock surfaces, to have higher incidences of broken tails than ground-dwelling species, perhaps because the tail is usually less important in locomotion in the first group. Many lizards possess conspicuously coloured tails and tail movements that seem likely to help distract attention from the head and body. Conspicuous tail colouring is more frequent and often better developed in young animals, which tend to be more vulnerable than adults, and in active species from open habitats where crypsis may not always be very effective. Conspicuous tails usually have contrasting light and dark areas in nocturnal forms but are often a single bright colour in diurnal ones, probably reflecting the visual capacities of their respective predators. The predominance of blue tails in day-active species may be because this colour is striking close to but not very arresting at a distance, so it may not attract predators from far away while still drawing their attention at close quarters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,245
(2019) · American Museum Novitates · doi:10.1206/novi · Cited by 4,138
Reptiles & Amphibians of Australia
Cogger, H. G. (2018) · doi:10.1071/9781486309702 · Cited by 1,355
Adaptive Coloration in Animals
Schmidt, K. P., & Cott, H. B. (1941) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1437762 · Cited by 1,318
Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft.
Gesellschaft, S. N. (1890) · Cited by 758
Brattstrom, B. H. (1965) · American Midland Naturalist · doi:10.2307/2423461 · Cited by 590
Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History
(2019) · Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History · doi:10.1206/amnb · Cited by 442
On Lizard Species Diversity: North American Flatland Deserts
Pianka, E. R. (1967) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1932670 · Cited by 326
The characteristics and affinities of the Amphisbaenia
Gans, C. (1978) · The Transactions of the Zoological Society of London · doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1978.tb00376.x · Cited by 216
Inferring the Properties of Predation and Other Injury‐Producing Agents from Injury Frequencies
Schoener, T. W. (1979) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936958 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Evolution of animal regeneration: re-emergence of a field
Bely, A. E., & Nyberg, K. G. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.005 · Cited by 512
Benn, A. L., McLelland, D. J., & Whittaker, A. L. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9010027 · Cited by 98
Mechanical properties and morphological correlates of fragile skin in gekkonid lizards
Bauer, A. M., Russell, A. P., & Shadwick, R. E. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.145.1.79 · Cited by 73
Welfare assessment tools in zoos: from theory to practice
Jones, N., Sherwen, S. L., Robbins, R., McLelland, D. J., & Whittaker, A. L. (2022) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci9040170 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnold, E. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Natural History
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1984-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-169
- ISSN
- 0022-2933 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5262
- OpenAlex
- W2052253378
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary aspects of tail shedding in lizards and their relatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00222938400770131
- The paper
- Arnold, E. N. (1984). Evolutionary aspects of tail shedding in lizards and their relatives. Journal of Natural History. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938400770131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.