The Impact of Pathological Narcissism on Psychotherapy Utilization, Initial Symptom Severity, and Early-Treatment Symptom Change: A Naturalistic Investigation
Abstract
The impact of pathological narcissism on psychotherapy has seldom been investigated empirically, despite extensive clinical theory proposing that highly narcissistic individuals should be reluctant to engage in treatment and derive smaller benefits from therapy. In this study, we investigate the relationship between scores on the Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI; Pincus et al., 2009 Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A. G. C. and Levy, K. N. 2009. Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21: 365–379. doi:10.1037/a0016530[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), which assesses both narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability, and clinical variables in a sample of outpatients (N = 60) at a community mental health center. Results indicated that grandiosity, but not vulnerability, was negatively related to the use of adjunctive services and positively predicted client-initiated termination of psychotherapy. In addition, grandiosity and vulnerability were related to initial levels of different symptoms in multilevel models using a subsample (n = 41) but not generally related to the linear rate of symptom change in early psychotherapy. The results highlight the clinical utility of assessing pathological narcissism in a real-world psychotherapeutic context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The presence of elevated dimensional measures of pathological narcissism predicts an increased drop-out rate from psychotherapy.
“the presence of elevated dimensional measures of pathological narcissism predicted an increased drop-out rate (89)”
From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [89]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 82 · Cited by 137
- Authors
- Ellison, W. D., Levy, K. N., Cain, N. M., Ansell, E. B., & Pincus, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Long Island University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality Assessment
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-300
- ISSN
- 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7752
- OpenAlex
- W2060240571
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- pathological narcissism, narcissistic grandiosity, narcissistic vulnerability, Pathological Narcissism Inventory, psychotherapy utilization, symptom severity, symptom change, outpatients, community mental health centers, treatment engagement
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Narcissism, Personality Disorders, Psychotherapy, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review