Cited by 73Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The Selfishness Questionnaire: Egocentric, Adaptive, and Pathological Forms of Selfishness

Raine, Adrian, Uh, Stepheni·2019·Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract

Despite its importance in society, there is virtually no standardized research on the personality trait of selfishness, in part due to the absence of an assessment instrument. The central aim of this study was to develop a brief (2-3 min) self-report personality measure of selfishness with three main subtypes: egocentric, adaptive, and pathological. Questionnaires were administered to an undergraduate sample, with replicability and generalizability tested on a community population. A confirmatory factor analysis supported the existence of the three hypothesized forms of selfishness. Good internal reliability, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, factorial validity, incremental validity, and criterion validity were documented. Selfishness was associated with reduced levels of mindfulness and more utilitarian decision making, whereas Tibetan Buddhist monks were less selfish than controls. Findings from the student sample were replicated in the community sample. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic examination of the personality construct of selfishness and the first instrument to assess selfishness and its variants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00223891.2018.1455692

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 73

Authors
Raine, A., & Uh, S.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Raine, Adrian
Venue
Journal of Personality Assessment
Published
2018-04-19
Volume
101
Issue
5
Pages
503-514
ISSN
  • 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7752
OpenAlex
W2802490614
Cited by
73
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
6.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
GVR Khodadad Family Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
selfishness, personality traits, self-report questionnaire development, mindfulness, utilitarian decision-making, Tibetan Buddhist monks
MeSH terms
Ego, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personality, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review