Cited by 40Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Clarifying the Links Between Grandiose Narcissism and Parenting

Horton, Robert S., Tritch, Tanner·2014·The Journal of Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated the links between parenting and grandiose narcissism in hopes of clarifying recent empirical discrepancies. One-hundred forty-five participants completed the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and reported about their parents' support, coldness, monitoring, psychological control, and overvaluation. Psychological control was associated positively with narcissism, whereas monitoring and coldness were associated negatively. Overvaluation and parental support showed no reliable associations with narcissism. Analysis of the components of narcissism further elucidated these links. The results are interpreted in light of previous findings and as consistent with social learning and psychodynamic theories regarding the origins of narcissism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00223980.2012.752337

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grandiose narcissism generally manifests null to very small relations with developmental events and parenting, with some small and inconsistent relations with lower parental monitoring, higher warmth, and overvaluation.

    “Grandiose narcissism generally manifests null to very small relations with developmental events and parenting (e.g., Horton & Tritch 2014, Miller et al. 2010a), although there are some small and inconsistent relations with lower parental monitoring (e.g., Horton et al. 2006), higher warmth (Horton et al. 2006), and overvaluation (e.g., Otway & Vignoles 2006).”

    From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Horton & Tritch 2014

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 40

Authors
Horton, R. S., & Tritch, T.
Affiliations
Wabash College (US)
Venue
The Journal of Psychology
Published
2013-11-26
Volume
148
Issue
2
Pages
133-143
ISSN
  • 0022-3980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1019
OpenAlex
W2110615202
Cited by
40
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
grandiose narcissism, parenting, parental psychological control, parental supervision, parental support, overvaluation, social learning theory, psychodynamic theory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Object Attachment, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Development, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Psychoanalytic Theory, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Self Concept, Students, Reproducibility of Results, Parenting, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review