Parental Invalidation and the Development of Narcissism
Abstract
Parenting behaviors and childhood experiences have played a central role in theoretical approaches to the etiology of narcissism. Research has suggested an association between parenting and narcissism; however, it has been limited in its examination of different narcissism subtypes and individual differences in parenting behaviors. This study investigates the influence of perceptions of parental invalidation, an important aspect of parenting behavior theoretically associated with narcissism. Correlational and hierarchical regression analyses were conducted using a sample of 442 Australian participants to examine the relationship between invalidating behavior from mothers and fathers, and grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Results indicate that stronger recollections of invalidating behavior from either mothers or fathers are associated with higher levels of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism when controlling for age, gender, and the related parenting behaviors of rejection, coldness, and overprotection. The lowest levels of narcissism were found in individuals who reported low levels of invalidation in both parents. These findings support the idea that parental invalidation is associated with narcissism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This type of attachment trauma, stemming from emotionally invalidating environments, is central to Kohut's theory of narcissistic development and has found support in recent research.
“This type of attachment trauma, stemming from emotionally invalidating environments, is central to Kohut’s theory of narcissistic development [69, 70], and has found support in recent research [71].”
From Living with pathological narcissism: a qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [71]
Third-generation studies have documented differential etiologies for vulnerable versus grandiose narcissism and a multifactorial etiology of NPD.
“Those studies have documented differential etiologies for vulnerable versus grandiose narcissism and a multifactorial etiology of NPD.”
From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [63]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Huxley, E., & Bizumic, B.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Huxley, Elizabeth
- ORCID
- Huxley, Elizabeth
- Venue
- The Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-11-18
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 130-147
- ISSN
- 0022-3980 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1019
- OpenAlex
- W2551045650
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- narcissism, grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, parental behavior, childhood experiences, mothers, fathers, rejection, overprotection, coldness
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Australia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Narcissism, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Development, Parenting, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review