CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 264Marriage and Sexual RelationshipsSexual function and dysfunction studiesAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role of Sexual Self-Disclosure in the Sexual Satisfaction of Long-Term Heterosexual Couples

MacNeil, Sheila, Byers, E. Sandra·2009·Journal of Sex Research
DOI 10.1080/00224490802398399
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined two proposed pathways between sexual self-disclosure (SSD) and sexual satisfaction in a sample of 104 heterosexual couples in long-term relationships. According to the proposed instrumental pathway, disclosure of sexual preferences increases a partner's understanding of those preferences resulting in a sexual script that is more rewarding and less costly. A more favorable balance of sexual rewards to sexual costs, in turn, results in greater sexual satisfaction for the disclosing individual. According to the proposed expressive pathway, mutual self-disclosure contributes to relationship satisfaction, which in turn leads to greater sexual satisfaction. Support was found for the instrumental pathway for both men and women. Support also was found for an expressive pathway between own SSD and partner nonsexual self-disclosure (NSD) and men's sexual satisfaction, and between own NSD and women's sexual satisfaction. These results are interpreted in terms of mechanisms for establishing and maintaining sexual satisfaction in long-term relationships in men and women.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224490802398399

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Banmen J., 1985, Family Therapy, 12, 45
  2. Byers E. S., 1999, Canadian Journal of Counselling, 33, 95
  3. Lawrance K., 1998, Sexuality-related measures: A compendium (, 514
  4. MacNeil S., 1997, Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 6, 277

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 261

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
MacNeil, S., & Byers, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • University of New Brunswick (CA)
Corresponding author
Byers, E. Sandra
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Sex Research
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-02-03
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
3-14
ISSN
  • 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8519
DOI
10.1080/00224490802398399
OpenAlex
W1996229940
Cited by
264
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
FWCI
23.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
sexual self-disclosure, sexual satisfaction, relationship satisfaction, gender differences
MeSH terms
Canada, Communication, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Marriage, Models, Psychological, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Heterosexuality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review