The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and Bicultural Validation of the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale
Abstract
The development and bicultural validation of the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale (NSSS)--a 20 item, multidimensional, composite measure of sexual satisfaction--is presented. The development of the scale was based on a five-dimension, conceptual model that emphasized the importance of multiple domains of sexual behavior including sexual sensations, sexual awareness and focus, sexual exchange, emotional closeness, and sexual activity. Scale construction and validation were carried out using seven independent samples with over 2,000 participants aged 18 to 55 in Croatia and the United States. Primary data collection was completed using online survey tools. Analyses did not confirm the proposed conceptual framework but suggested a two-dimensional structure focusing on self ("ego-centered") and the other (a "partner- and sexual activity-centered" factor) domains, each containing items representing all five conceptual dimensions. Scale reliability (k = 20) was satisfactory for all samples, and construct validity was confirmed in both cultures. The NSSS was also found to have acceptable one-month stability. It is suggested that the NSSS may be a useful tool for assessing sexual satisfaction regardless of a person's gender, sexual orientation, and relationship status.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laumann, E. O., Nicolosi, A., Glasser, D. B., Paik, A., Gingell, C., Moreira, E., Wang, T., & for the GSSAB Investigators' Group (2005) · International Journal of Impotence Research · doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901250 · Cited by 1,415
Distress about sex: a national survey of women in heterosexual relationships.
Bancroft, J., Loftus, J., & Long, J. S. (2003) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1023420431760 · Cited by 774
Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples
BUTZER, B., & CAMPBELL, L. (2008) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00189.x · Cited by 469
Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student participants
Wiederman, M. W. (1999) · Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499909551968 · Cited by 264
Cited by
Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction
Brotto, L., Atallah, S., Johnson-Agbakwu, C., Rosenbaum, T., Abdo, C., Byers, E. S., Graham, C., Nobre, P., & Wylie, K. (2016) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.019 · Cited by 439
Is high sexual desire a risk for women’s relationship and sexual well-being?
Štulhofer, A., Bergeron, S., & Jurin, T. (2016) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1084984 · Cited by 22
Self-citationThe More You Know: Sexual Knowledge as a Predictor of Sexual Well-Being
Seifen, T., Shaw, C. M., Smith, C. V., & Johnson, L. R. (2022) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/0092623x.2022.2053017 · Cited by 13
Comfort in Treating Sexual Problems: Current Training and Counselor Self-Efficacy
Hipp, C. J., & Carlson, R. G. (2019) · The Family Journal · doi:10.1177/1066480719835342 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Štulhofer, A., Buško, V., & Brouillard, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-07-23
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 257-268
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W2056952807
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Bicultural Validation of the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00224490903100561
- The paper
- Štulhofer, A., Buško, V., & Brouillard, P. (2010). Development and Bicultural Validation of the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale. The Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903100561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.