The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
U.S. trends in feminine beauty and overadaptation
Abstract
Men place more importance on the physical attractiveness of women than women do on the physical attractiveness of men. As a result, women's social opportunities are more affected by their physical beauty than are men's, so that women are under more pressure to conform to an ideal of beauty. Although standards of female beauty are not as arbitrary as is sometimes claimed, they do vary greatly over time and across cultures. Modern institutions of advertising, retailing, and entertainment now produce vivid notions of beauty that change from year to year, placing stress upon women to conform to the body image currently in vogue. The best known of these beauty standards are the “bosom mania” of the 1950s and 1960s and the current trend toward slenderization. As women attempt to adapt to each of these changes, a minority overadapt, sometimes to the point of incapacitation. Among these over‐adaptations have been hysteria, early in the century, which was an exaggeration of the fragile feminine ideal of that time; bosom anxieties of the 1950s and 1960s, when women worried if their breasts were sufficiently large; and anorexia and bulimia today.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,259
David, F. N., & Tukey, J. W. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529486 · Cited by 12,708
Sexual Behavior in the Human Male
(1948) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/28.2.93 · Cited by 5,134
(1979) · Cited by 2,524
The evolution of human sexuality
Wilson, G. (1980) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(80)90074-4 · Cited by 2,505
Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande
BARTLETT, F. C. (1937) · Nature · doi:10.1038/140338a0 · Cited by 2,196
Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic Among the Azande
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912128297 · Cited by 2,050
Gómez, J. G., & Dally, P. (1979) · Cited by 1,965
Fox, J., Tukey, J. W., McNeil, D. R., Erickson, B. H., & Nosanchuk, T. A. (1978) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3340285 · Cited by 1,834
Cultural Expectations of Thinness in Women
Garner, D. M., Garfinkel, P. E., Schwartz, D., & Thompson, M. (1980) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1980.47.2.483 · Cited by 1,171
Cited by
Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance.
Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999) · doi:10.1037/10312-000 · Cited by 3,100
Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio
Singh, D. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293 · Cited by 1,334
Furnham, A., Badmin, N., & Sneade, I. (2002) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980209604820 · Cited by 783
Stice, E. (1994) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(94)90002-7 · Cited by 746
Heinberg, L. J., & Thompson, J. K. (1995) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.1995.14.4.325 · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazur, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1986-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 281-303
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W2021434226
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: U.S. trends in feminine beauty and overadaptation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00224498609551309
- The paper
- Mazur, A. (1986). U.S. trends in feminine beauty and overadaptation. Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498609551309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.