The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Men's self‐reports of unwanted sexual activity
Abstract
We investigated men's experience with unwanted sexual activity-including unwanted kissing, petting, or intercourse-engaged in because of physical or psychological pressure or from societal expectations about male sexuality. We developed a questionnaire asking if respondents had ever engaged in unwanted sexual activity for any of 51 reasons. This questionnaire was administered to 507 men and 486 women. More women (97.5%) than men (93.5%) had experienced unwanted sexual activity; more men (62.7%) than women (46.3%) had experienced unwanted intercourse. Using factor analysis, we grouped the 51 questionnaire items into 13 general reasons; we then compared percentages of men and women who had engaged in unwanted sexual activity for these 13 reasons. There were seven sex differences in reasons for unwanted sexual activity: Five were more frequent for women than men; two reasons were more frequent for men than women-peer pressure and desire for popularity. There were eight sex differences in reasons for unwanted intercourse; more men than women had engaged in unwanted intercourse for all eight. The double standard for male and female sexuality and implications for therapy are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization.
Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.50.3.455 · Cited by 1,444
Cited by
Peterson, Z. D., Voller, E. K., Polusny, M. A., & Murdoch, M. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.08.006 · Cited by 277
Murnen, S. K., & Kohlman, M. H. (2007) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9225-1 · Cited by 258
Male Sexual Victimization: Examining Men’s Experiences of Rape and Sexual Assault
Weiss, K. G. (2010) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x08322632 · Cited by 247
Kalichman, S. C., Benotsch, E., Rompa, D., Gore‐Felton, C., Austin, J., Luke, W., DiFonzo, K., Buckles, J., Kyomugisha, F., & Simpson, D. (2001) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224490109552065 · Cited by 147
Male Rape and the Careful Construction of the Male Victim
Graham, R. (2006) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/0964663906063571 · Cited by 113
An overview of the literature on female-perpetrated adult male sexual victimization
Fisher, N. L., & Pina, A. (2013) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.10.001 · Cited by 109
Katz, J., & Tirone, V. (2009) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9566-4 · Cited by 95
Self-Determination and Sexual Experience in Dating Relationships
Brunell, A. B., & Webster, G. D. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213485442 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1988-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-72
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W2067161720
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.