CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 102LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist StudiesGender, Sexuality, and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differences in Sexual Orientation Diversity and Sexual Fluidity in Attractions Among Gender Minority Adults in Massachusetts

Open access
Katz-Wise, Sabra L., Reisner, Sari L., Hughto, Jaclyn White, St. Amand, Colt·2016·The Journal of Sex Research
DOI 10.1080/00224499.2014.1003028PMC PMC4685005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study characterized sexual orientation identities and sexual fluidity in attractions in a community-based sample of self-identified transgender and gender-nonconforming adults in Massachusetts. Participants were recruited in 2013 using bimodel methods (online and in person) to complete a one-time, Web-based quantitative survey that included questions about sexual orientation identity and sexual fluidity. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to examine the correlates of self-reported changes in attractions ever in lifetime among the whole sample (n = 452) and after transition among those who reported social gender transition (n = 205). The sample endorsed diverse sexual orientation identities: 42.7% queer, 19.0% other nonbinary, 15.7% bisexual, 12.2% straight, and 10.4% gay/lesbian. Overall, 58.2% reported having experienced changes in sexual attractions in their lifetime. In adjusted models, trans masculine individuals were more likely than trans feminine individuals to report sexual fluidity in their lifetime (aRR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.34, 2.12). Among those who transitioned, 64.6% reported a change in attractions posttransition, and trans masculine individuals were less likely than trans feminine individuals to report sexual fluidity (aRR = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.28, 0.69). Heterogeneity of sexual orientation identities and sexual fluidity in attractions are the norm rather than the exception among gender minority people.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224499.2014.1003028

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Allison P. D., 2001, Missing data
  2. Connell R. W., 1995, Masculinities
  3. Hoskin, R. A. (2013).Femme theory: Femininity's challenge to Western feminist pedagogies(Unpublished master's thesis). Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  4. Reisner S. L., 2014, Discrimination and health in Massachusetts: A statewide survey of transgender and gender nonconforming adults

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 102

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Katz-Wise, S. L., Reisner, S. L., Hughto, J. W., & St. Amand, C.
Affiliations
  • Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital
  • Harvard University (US)
  • The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health
  • Department of Psychology, University of Houston
Corresponding author
Reisner, Sari L.
ORCID
Reisner, Sari L.
Venue
The Journal of Sex Research
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2015-07-08
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
74-84
ISSN
  • 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8519
DOI
10.1080/00224499.2014.1003028
PMC
PMC4685005
OpenAlex
W1550218728
Cited by
102
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
14.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Dr. Katz-Wise was supported by a grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (K99HD082340). Dr. Reisner was partially supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH094323). Ms. Hughto was supported by Award Numbers T32MH020031 and P30MH062294 from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
sexual orientation identity, sexual fluidity, sexual attraction, transgender people, gender non-conforming people, sexual orientation diversity, bisexual identity, nonbinary identity, Massachusetts
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Sexual Behavior, Sexuality, Young Adult, Transgender Persons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review