The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
21st Century Parent–Child Sex Communication in the United States: A Process Review
Open accessAbstract
Parent-child sex communication results in the transmission of family expectations, societal values, and role modeling of sexual health risk-reduction strategies. Parent-child sex communication's potential to curb negative sexual health outcomes has sustained a multidisciplinary effort to better understand the process and its impact on the development of healthy sexual attitudes and behaviors among adolescents. This review advances what is known about the process of sex communication in the United States by reviewing studies published from 2003 to 2015. We used the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, SocINDEX, and PubMed, and the key terms "parent child" AND "sex education" for the initial query; we included 116 original articles for analysis. Our review underscores long-established factors that prevent parents from effectively broaching and sustaining talks about sex with their children and has also identified emerging concerns unique to today's parenting landscape. Parental factors salient to sex communication are established long before individuals become parents and are acted upon by influences beyond the home. Child-focused communication factors likewise describe a maturing audience that is far from captive. The identification of both enduring and emerging factors that affect how sex communication occurs will inform subsequent work that will result in more positive sexual health outcomes for adolescents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
The integrative review: updated methodology
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x · Cited by 10,241
The Bioecological Model of Human Development
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007) · Handbook of Child Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114 · Cited by 5,760 · cited 5×
“This construct includes changing expectations and events in larger society, within and across generations over the life course (Bronfenbrenner & Morris, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialWriting Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples
Torraco, R. J. (2005) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484305278283 · Cited by 3,534 · cited 1×
“A staged review was conducted (Torraco, 2005), which began with an initial review of the titles and abstracts, followed by an in-depth reading of each article that met the inclusion criteria.”
Method(1998) · Cited by 3,292
Uses and Misuses of Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological Theory of Human Development
Tudge, J. R. H., Mokrova, I., Hatfield, B. E., & Karnik, R. B. (2009) · Journal of Family Theory & Review · doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00026.x · Cited by 879
(2014) · Cited by 707
Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Cooper, K. (2011) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-29 · Cited by 461
Cited by
Widman, L., Javidi, H., Maheux, A. J., Evans, R., Nesi, J., & Choukas-Bradley, S. (2021) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-021-09866-1 · Cited by 58
Prikhidko, A., & Kenny, M. C. (2021) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105810 · Cited by 37
PettyJohn, M. E., Cary, K. M., Nolen, E., & Gallegos, T. A. (2025) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2024.2446643 · Cited by 12
Parent Perspectives about Initiating Contraception Conversations with Adolescent Daughters
Durante, J. C., Higashi, R. T., Lau, M., Tiro, J. A., & Francis, J. K. R. (2023) · Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2023.02.008 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Flores, D., & Barroso, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-01-06
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 532-548
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W2570840531
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 119
- FWCI
- 27.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 21st Century Parent–Child Sex Communication in the United States: A Process Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00224499.2016.1267693
- The paper
- Flores, D., & Barroso, J. (2017). 21st Century Parent–Child Sex Communication in the United States: A Process Review. The Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1267693
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.