Cited by 61Personality Traits and PsychologyLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicySexual Differentiation and Disorders

Personality and Sexual Orientation: New Data and Meta-analysis

Allen, Mark S., Robson, Davina A.·2020·The Journal of Sex Research

Abstract

This research explored associations between personality and sexual orientation. In Study 1, we explored whether the Big Five trait dimensions relate to sexual orientation in a nationally representative sample of Australian adults ( n = 13,351). Personality differences were observed between those who identified as heterosexual (straight), bisexual, and homosexual (gay/lesbian) on all five measured traits. In Study 2, we conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of personality and sexual orientation. A total of 21 studies (35 independent samples, 262 effect sizes) comprising 377,951 men and women were identified that satisfied inclusion criteria. Results showed that bisexual individuals reported higher levels of openness than homosexual individuals, who in turn, reported higher levels of openness than heterosexual individuals. Bisexual individuals also report lower levels of conscientiousness than both heterosexual and homosexual individuals. Sex moderation effects showed that homosexual men scored higher than heterosexual men on neuroticism, agreeableness and conscientiousness, whereas homosexual women scored lower than heterosexual women on extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. There was also evidence that personality differences between sexual orientation categories tend to decline with age. These findings align with the gender-shift hypothesis and should be of interest to theorists working in personality science and sexual identity development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224499.2020.1768204

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 86 · Cited by 61

Authors
Allen, M. S., & Robson, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Allen, Mark S.
Venue
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2020-06-08
Volume
57
Issue
8
Pages
953-965
ISSN
  • 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8519
OpenAlex
W3034062244
Cited by
61
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
personality, sexual orientation, Big Five personality traits, openness to experience, conscientiousness, neuroticism, agreeableness, extraversion, bisexuality, homosexuality, heterosexuality, gender differences, age differences, sexual identity development
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Bisexuality, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Sexual Behavior, Homosexuality, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review