Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 528

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Personality, Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Organ, Dennis W., Lingl, Andreas·1995·The Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

The personality dimensions agreeableness and conscientiousness were hypothesized to account for commonly shared variance between job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Findings from 99 employees in the United Kingdom and the United States indicate that these two dimensions do indeed account for substantial variance in satisfaction and that conscientiousness also accounts for unique variance in one dimension of OCB. Satisfaction accounts for unique variance in OCB not explained by either of these personality dimensions. No evidence was found for differences in main or moderated effects in the U.K. and U.S. samples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224545.1995.9713963

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Organ, D. W., & Lingl, A.
Venue
The Journal of Social Psychology
Published
1995-06
Volume
135
Issue
3
Pages
339-350
ISSN
  • 0022-4545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1183
OpenAlex
W2042847067
Cited by
528
References
2
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.