Emotional experiences of ghosting
Abstract
Although ghosting (i.e., unilaterally ending a relationship by ceasing communication) has only recently entered the lexicon, it is a regularly used form of relationship dissolution. However, little research has examined the emotional experiences of ghosting, particularly the experiences of those on both sides of the ghosting process. In a multi-method study, participants who had both ghosted and been ghosted in previous romantic relationships ( N = 80) provided narratives of their experiences and completed questionnaires. The narrative responses were analyzed by coders and by using LIWC. Ghosters and ghostees used similar overall levels of positively and negatively valenced words to describe their experiences, but ghosters were more likely to express guilt and relief, whereas ghostees were more likely to express sadness and hurt feelings. Ghostees also experienced more of a threat to their fundamental needs - control, self-esteem, belongingness, meaningful existence - than ghosters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ghosters experienced guilt but also relief, whereas ghostees were more likely to experience sadness and hurt.
“Ghosters experienced guilt but also relief, whereas ghostees were more likely to experience sadness and hurt [2,17].”
From Ghosting: Abandonment in the Digital Era (2023) · cites this paper as [2]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 74 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Freedman, G., Powell, D. N., Le, B., & Williams, K. D.
- Affiliations
- St. Mary's College of Maryland (US)
- Roanoke College (US)
- Haverford College (US)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Freedman, Gili
- Venue
- The Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-05-27
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-386
- ISSN
- 0022-4545 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1183
- OpenAlex
- W4281683391
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 8.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- funding
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
- Keywords
- ghosting, breakup, romantic relationships, emotional experience, guilt, relief, sadness, hurt feelings, basic psychological needs, self-esteem, sense of belonging, control, meaningful life, narrative analysis, LIWC
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Emotions, Guilt, Humans, Self Concept
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review