Cited by 47Attachment and Relationship DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionForgiveness and Related Behaviors

Emotional experiences of ghosting

Freedman, Gili, Powell, Darcey N., Le, Benjamin, Williams, Kipling D.·2024·The Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

Although ghosting (i.e., unilaterally ending a relationship by ceasing communication) has only recently entered the lexicon, it is a regularly used form of relationship dissolution. However, little research has examined the emotional experiences of ghosting, particularly the experiences of those on both sides of the ghosting process. In a multi-method study, participants who had both ghosted and been ghosted in previous romantic relationships ( N = 80) provided narratives of their experiences and completed questionnaires. The narrative responses were analyzed by coders and by using LIWC. Ghosters and ghostees used similar overall levels of positively and negatively valenced words to describe their experiences, but ghosters were more likely to express guilt and relief, whereas ghostees were more likely to express sadness and hurt feelings. Ghostees also experienced more of a threat to their fundamental needs - control, self-esteem, belongingness, meaningful existence - than ghosters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224545.2022.2081528

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ghosters experienced guilt but also relief, whereas ghostees were more likely to experience sadness and hurt.

    “Ghosters experienced guilt but also relief, whereas ghostees were more likely to experience sadness and hurt [2,17].”

    From Ghosting: Abandonment in the Digital Era (2023) · cites this paper as [2]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 74 · Cited by 47

Authors
Freedman, G., Powell, D. N., Le, B., & Williams, K. D.
Affiliations
  • St. Mary's College of Maryland (US)
  • Roanoke College (US)
  • Haverford College (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Freedman, Gili
Venue
The Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2022-05-27
Volume
164
Issue
3
Pages
367-386
ISSN
  • 0022-4545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1183
OpenAlex
W4281683391
Cited by
47
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8
FWCI
8.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
funding
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
Keywords
ghosting, breakup, romantic relationships, emotional experience, guilt, relief, sadness, hurt feelings, basic psychological needs, self-esteem, sense of belonging, control, meaningful life, narrative analysis, LIWC
MeSH terms
Communication, Emotions, Guilt, Humans, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review