The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Democratic Ideology in Islamist Opposition? The Muslim Brotherhood's ‘Civil State’
Abstract
Over the last two decades, the political ideology of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood has evolved to proactively advocate a democratic form of government. This evolution has taken place both through protracted internal discussion and through experiments in participatory politics, leading the Brotherhood to further develop Islamic justification for a democratic regime. Despite generational differences within the Brotherhood over the extent of democratic activism, the Brotherhood's emerging political platform asserts the need both for a democratic regime and a ‘civil state’ which guarantees political and civil liberties within the boundaries specified by Islam. Three guiding principles are central to the Brotherhood's current political vision, including legislative compliance with Islamic law, a wide range of civil and political liberties with an emphasis on equal treatment, and a robust electoral process that institutionalizes guarantees of democratic accountability for elected officials. These principles allow the Muslim Brotherhood to effectively challenge the current Egyptian regime on democratic grounds, but are also in tension with one another, highlighting the boundaries of legislative independence under a political system constrained by Islamic law.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is also a substantial literature on the development of hybrid theodemocratic ideologies and constitutional visions by Islamist groups out of power before 2011 (Baker 2006, El-Ghobashy 2005, Harnisch & Mecham 2009, March 2013, Rutherford 2006, Stilt 2010, Wickham 2013).”
From Political Islam: Theory (2015) · cites this paper as Harnisch & Mecham 2009
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
March, A. F. (2015) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-082112-141250 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Harnisch, C., & Mecham, Q.
- ORCID
- Mecham, Quinn
- Venue
- Middle Eastern Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-205
- ISSN
- 0026-3206 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-7881
- OpenAlex
- W2070850375
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 13 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 20.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Middle Eastern Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
- Keywords
- Muslim Brotherhood, civil state, democratic ideology, Islamic political thought, Islamic law, political liberalism, civil liberties, electoral accountability, generational differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Democratic Ideology in Islamist Opposition? The Muslim Brotherhood's ‘Civil State’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00263200802611408
- The paper
- Harnisch, C., & Mecham, Q. (2009). Democratic Ideology in Islamist Opposition? The Muslim Brotherhood's ‘Civil State’. Middle Eastern Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200802611408