Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 439

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynamic correlation

COHEN, ARON J., HANDY, NICHOLAS C.·2001·Molecular Physics

Abstract

From a knowledge of the Hartree-Fock and exact non-relativistic energies of atoms, the correlation energy Ec, as defined by Lowdin, may be calculated. For atoms this correlation is defined as dynamic correlation. The separate like-spin and unlike-spin contributions, Ecσσ, Ecαβ, may be calculated as a sum of pair energies from quantum chemistry; we have used the unrestricted M⊘ller-Plesset second-order algorithm, and then scaled them to give Ec. These three values may also be computed using dynamic correlation functionals, with the Stoll partitioning. The VWN, LYP and P91 functionals were studied for the atoms from H to Ar. Although the total correlation energies of LYP and P91 are similar, only P91 gives a semi-sensible breakdown into the Ecσσ, and Ecαβ components. It is immediately apparent that a new functional, OPTC, derived from the P91 components as 0.6625 x Ecσσ, + 1. 1015 x Ecαβ is an improvement (its mean absolute error is only 0.006 Eh). Using the recently introduced improved exchange functional OPTX (obtained through a fit to the HF energies of atoms), Kohn-Sham calculations were performed on the atoms using the OPT(=OPTX + OPTC) functional. The total energies have a mean absolute error of 0.006 Eh. The study then moves to molecules. First it is shown that the dynamic correlation energy contribution to the dissociation energies is very similar (within 2kcalmol−1 in most cases), whether it is calculated with LYP, P91 or OPTC. A calculation is then made of the HF contribution, the dynamic contribution through OPTC and the left-right contribution through OPTX, to molecular binding. In many cases the sum agrees with the observed value, but in some cases the prediction is significantly in error, e.g. O2 is overbound by 10 kcal mol−1. Thus either OPTX or OPTC or both are inadequate. An attempt was made to determine improved local exchange and correlation functionals by fitting to both atomic and molecular data, but this was unsuccessful. The conclusion is that the method is close to the limit of accuracy achievable from separately optimized local exchange and correlation functionals. Finally, a new hybrid functional O3LYP, which is a substantial improvement on B3LYP, is presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00268970010023435

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 439

Metadata

Authors
COHEN, A. J., & HANDY, N. C.
Venue
Molecular Physics
Published
2001-04-10
Volume
99
Issue
7
Pages
607-615
ISSN
  • 0026-8976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3028
OpenAlex
W4252515185
Cited by
439
References
1
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic correlation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00268970010023435
The paper
COHEN, A. J., & HANDY, N. C. (2001). Dynamic correlation. Molecular Physics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970010023435

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.