The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tests of the empirical potential structure refinement method and a new method of application to neutron diffraction data on water
Abstract
Empirical potential structure refinement (EPSR) is a method for developing a structural model of a liquid for which diffraction measurements are available. The EPSR technique involves refining a starting interatomic potential energy function in a way that produces the best possible agreement between the simulated and measured site-site partial structure factors. Here a series of test simulations are performed to establish how well the EPSR method can recover the interatomic potential for a single component fluid of Lennard-Jones particles, and for a binary fluid consisting of charged atoms interacting at short range by a Lennard-Jones potential. Special attention is given to the problem of developing an accurate interatomic potential for water using these procedures. An alternative method for perturbing the starting potential is used to obtain the best possible fit to the diffraction data. The resulting parametrization of the water potential is in contrast to many existing effective potentials for water, and indicates that water molecules in the liquid at ambient conditions are highly polarized, as has been suggested in recent ‘first-principles’ simulations of water. Three-body correlation functions and spatial density functions derived from the EPSR simulations show excellent agreement with those obtained with the model potential simulations. However, the potentials extracted by EPSR are found to depend on the constraints applied to the hardness of the core potential and the energy and pressure of the simulation, even when the fits to the data are equally good. It is concluded that performing EPSR on diffraction data can be used as a good test for interatomic potentials and to derive reliable many-body structures in the liquid state, but cannot on its own be used to derive a reliable set of site-site pair potentials for a particular system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Cited by
Simulating water with rigid non-polarizable models: a general perspective
Vega, C., & Abascal, J. L. F. (2011) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c1cp22168j · Cited by 991
McGreevy, R. L. (2001) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/13/46/201 · Cited by 829
Structural Analysis of Molecular Materials Using the Pair Distribution Function
Terban, M. W., & Billinge, S. J. L. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00237 · Cited by 426
Perspective on the structure of liquid water
Nilsson, A., & Pettersson, L. G. M. (2011) · Chemical Physics · doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.07.021 · Cited by 349
Ion solvation and water structure in potassium halide aqueous solutions
Soper, A. K., & Weckström, K. (2006) · Biophysical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2006.04.009 · Cited by 322
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- SOPER, A. K.
- Venue
- Molecular Physics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-09-10
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1503-1516
- ISSN
- 0026-8976 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2162436885
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tests of the empirical potential structure refinement method and a new method of application to neutron diffraction data on water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00268970110056889
- The paper
- SOPER, A. K. (2001). Tests of the empirical potential structure refinement method and a new method of application to neutron diffraction data on water. Molecular Physics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970110056889
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.