Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electron correlation and the self-interaction error of density functional theory

POLO, VICTOR, KRAKA, ELFI, CREMER, DIETER·2002·Molecular Physics

Abstract

The self-interaction error (SIE) of commonly used DFT functionals has been systematically investigated by comparing the electron density distribution ρ(r) generated by self-interaction corrected DFT (SIC-DFT) with a series of reference densities obtained by DFT or wavefunction theory (WFT) methods that cover typical electron correlation effects. Although the SIE of GGA functionals is considerably smaller than that of LDA functionals, it has significant consequences for the coverage of electron correlation effects at the DFT level of theory. The exchange SIE mimics long range (non-dynamic) pair correlation effects, and is responsible for the fact that the electron density of DFT exchange-only calculations resembles often that of MP4, MP2 or even CCSD(T) calculations. Changes in the electron density caused by SIC-DFT exchange are comparable with those that are associated with HF exchange. Correlation functionals contract the density towards the bond and the valence region, thus taking negative charge out of the van der Waals region where these effects are exaggerated by the influence of the SIE of the correlation functional. Hence, SIC-DFT leads in total to a relatively strong redistribution of negative charge from van der Waals, non-bonding, and valence regions of heavy atoms to the bond regions. These changes, although much stronger, resemble those obtained when comparing the densities of hybrid functionals such as B3LYP with the corresponding GGA functional BLYP. Hence, the balanced mixing of local and non-local exchange and correlation effects as it is achieved by hybrid functionals mimics SIC-DFT and can be considered as an economic way to include some SIC into standard DFT. However, the investigation shows also that the SIC-DFT description of molecules is unreliable because the standard functionals used were optimized for DFT including the SIE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00268970110111788

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
POLO, V., KRAKA, E., & CREMER, D.
Venue
Molecular Physics
Published
2002-06-10
Volume
100
Issue
11
Pages
1771-1790
ISSN
  • 0026-8976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3028
OpenAlex
W2003610980
Cited by
230
References
1
FWCI
8.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron correlation and the self-interaction error of density functional theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00268970110111788
The paper
POLO, V., KRAKA, E., & CREMER, D. (2002). Electron correlation and the self-interaction error of density functional theory. Molecular Physics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970110111788

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.