The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for nuclear motion in one step: direct dynamics of non-adiabatic systems
Abstract
A review of direct dynamics methods is given, focusing on their application to non-adiabatic photochemistry–i.e. systems in which a conical intersection plays an important role. Direct dynamics simulations use electronic structure calculations to obtain the potential energy surface only as it is required ‘on-the-fly’. This is in contrast to traditional methods that require the surface to be globally known as an analytic function before a simulation can be performed. The properties and abilities, with descriptions of calculations made, of the three main methods are compared: trajectory surface hopping (TSH), ab initio multiple spawning (AIMS), and variational multi-configuration Gaussian wavepackets (vMCG). TSH is the closest to classical dynamics, is the simplest to implement, but is hard to converge, and even then not always accurate. AIMS solves the time-dependent Schrödinger more rigorously, but as its basis functions follow classical trajectories again suffers from poor convergence. vMCG is harder to implement, but its basis functions do not follow classical trajectories and it converges much faster.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
Bohm, D. (1952) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.85.166 · Cited by 5,510
Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels
Zener, C. (1932) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rspa.1932.0165 · Cited by 4,572
Manthe, U., Meyer, H.-D., & Cederbaum, L. S. (1992) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.463007 · Cited by 998
Ben-Nun, M., & Martı́nez, T. J. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.476142 · Cited by 399
Cited by
Recent Advances and Perspectives on Nonadiabatic Mixed Quantum–Classical Dynamics
Crespo-Otero, R., & Barbatti, M. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577 · Cited by 733
Ab Initio Nonadiabatic Quantum Molecular Dynamics
Curchod, B. F. E., & Martínez, T. J. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00423 · Cited by 709
Biochemistry and Theory of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer
Migliore, A., Polizzi, N. F., Therien, M. J., & Beratan, D. N. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr4006654 · Cited by 520
Machine Learning for Electronically Excited States of Molecules
Westermayr, J., & Marquetand, P. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00749 · Cited by 398
Quantum dynamics simulations using Gaussian wavepackets: the vMCG method
Richings, G. W., Polyak, I., Spinlove, K. E., Worth, G. A., Burghardt, I., & Lasorne, B. (2015) · International Reviews in Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1080/0144235x.2015.1051354 · Cited by 338
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Worth, G. A., Robb, M. A., & Lasorne, B.
- Venue
- Molecular Physics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-08-20
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 16-18
- Pages
- 2077-2091
- ISSN
- 0026-8976 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2010286574
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for nuclear motion in one step: direct dynamics of non-adiabatic systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00268970802172503
- The paper
- Worth, G. A., Robb, M. A., & Lasorne, B. (2008). Solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for nuclear motion in one step: direct dynamics of non-adiabatic systems. Molecular Physics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970802172503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.