The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Applicability of the multi-reference double-excitation CI (MRD-CI) method to the calculation of electronic wavefunctions and comparison with related techniques
Abstract
Implementation of a multi-reference double-excitation CI (MRD-CI) method is discussed and its results are compared with those of related techniques. This approach employs a configuration selection procedure to order the various generated species according to their energy-lowering capability and then uses an energy extrapolation procedure based on perturbation theory to obtain suitably accurate estimates of the eigenvalues of the entire MRD-CI space. By employing this selection procedure it is possible to test from 2000 to 4000 symmetry-adapted functions (SAF's) per second of CPU time on an IBM 370–168 system, thereby allowing one to apply the energy extrapolation quite conveniently to CI spaces consisting of several hundred thousand species. By systematically increasing the number of reference configurations in the MRD-CI it is clear that the limit of a full CI can be approached and as a result such a computational procedure appears to be generally valid for any type of electronic state and for any nuclear geometry as well as being quite practical. Applications to a number of molecular systems are considered and comparison is made with the results of other theoretical techniques presently available, from which studies it is concluded that the MRD-CI can account for roughly 95 per cent of the total valence-shell correlation attainable with a given AO basis while still employing a relatively small number of reference configurations to generate the associated CI space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interaction of hydrogen with solid surfaces
Christmann, K. (1988) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/0167-5729(88)90009-x · Cited by 1,120
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Convergence of an improved CIPSI algorithm
Evangelisti, S., Daudey, J.-P., & Malrieu, J.-P. (1983) · Chemical Physics · doi:10.1016/0301-0104(83)85011-3 · Cited by 438
Use of Cluster Expansion Methods in the Open-Shell Correlation Problem
Mukherjee, D., & Pal, S. (1989) · Advances in Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3276(08)60629-2 · Cited by 403
Combining Wave Function Methods with Density Functional Theory for Excited States
Ghosh, S., Verma, P., Cramer, C. J., Gagliardi, L., & Truhlar, D. G. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00193 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Buenker, R. J., Peyerimhoff, S. D., & Butscher, W.
- Venue
- Molecular Physics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1978-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 771-791
- ISSN
- 0026-8976 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2097609461
- Cited by
- 1,028
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Applicability of the multi-reference double-excitation CI (MRD-CI) method to the calculation of electronic wavefunctions and comparison with related techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00268977800100581
- The paper
- Buenker, R. J., Peyerimhoff, S. D., & Butscher, W. (1978). Applicability of the multi-reference double-excitation CI (MRD-CI) method to the calculation of electronic wavefunctions and comparison with related techniques. Molecular Physics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977800100581
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.