Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 640

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phase equilibria of fluid interfaces and confined fluids: Non-local versus local density functionals

Tarazona, P., Marconi, U. Marini Bettolo, Evans, R.·1987·Molecular Physics

Abstract

Phase transitions at fluid interfaces and in fluids confined in pores have been investigated by means of a density functional approach that treats attractive forces between fluid molecules in mean-field approximation and models repulsive forces by hard-spheres. Two types of approximation were employed for the hard-sphere free energy functional: (a) the well-known local density approximation (LDA) that omits short-ranged correlations and (b) a non-local smoothed density approximation (SDA) that includes such correlations and therefore accounts for the oscillations of the density profile near walls. Three different kinds of phase transition were considered: (i) wetting transition. The transition from partial to complete wetting at a single adsorbing wall is shifted to lower temperatures and tends to become first-order when the more-realistic SDA is employed. Comparison of the results suggests that the LDA overestimates the contact angle γ in a partial wetting situation. (ii) capillary evaporation of a fluid confined between two parallel hard walls. This transition, from dense ‘liquid’ to dilute ‘gas’, occurs in a supersaturated fluid (p > p sat). The lines of capillary coexistence calculated in the LDA and SDA are rather close, suggesting that non-local effects are not especially important in this case. (iii) capillary condensation of fluids confined between two adsorbing walls or in a single cylindrical pore. For a partial wetting situation the condensation pressures p(<p sat) obtained from the SDA are in remarkably good agreement with the macroscopic Laplace (or Kelvin) prediction for wall separations H or pore radii R c ≳ 5σ; σ is a molecular diameter. While, because of different packing, the density profiles of the fluid differ considerably between slits and cylinders this has little effect on the coexistence line until H or R c ∼ σ. In contrast to the LDA the SDA describes two-dimensional-like liquid-gas coexistence for very narrow pores (H < σ) and temperatures below the two-dimensional critical temperature and this has ramifications for the existence of capillary critical points.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00268978700100381

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 640

Metadata

Authors
Tarazona, P., Marconi, U. M. B., & Evans, R.
Venue
Molecular Physics
Published
1987-02-20
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
573-595
ISSN
  • 0026-8976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3028
OpenAlex
W1532304699
Cited by
640
References
0
FWCI
24.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase equilibria of fluid interfaces and confined fluids: Non-local versus local density functionals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00268978700100381
The paper
Tarazona, P., Marconi, U. M. B., & Evans, R. (1987). Phase equilibria of fluid interfaces and confined fluids: Non-local versus local density functionals. Molecular Physics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978700100381

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.