The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Doubly-Latent Models of School Contextual Effects: Integrating Multilevel and Structural Equation Approaches to Control Measurement and Sampling Error
Abstract
This article is a methodological-substantive synergy. Methodologically, we demonstrate latent-variable contextual models that integrate structural equation models (with multiple indicators) and multilevel models. These models simultaneously control for and unconfound measurement error due to sampling of items at the individual (L1) and group (L2) levels and sampling error due the sampling of persons in the aggregation of L1 characteristics to form L2 constructs. We consider a set of models that are latent or manifest in relation to sampling items (measurement error) and sampling of persons (sampling error) and discuss when different models might be most useful. We demonstrate the flexibility of these 4 core models by extending them to include random slopes, latent (single-level or cross-level) interactions, and latent quadratic effects. Substantively we use these models to test the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE), showing that individual student levels of academic self-concept (L1-ASC) are positively associated with individual level achievement (L1-ACH) and negatively associated with school-average achievement (L2-ACH)-a finding with important policy implications for the way schools are structured. Extending tests of the BFLPE in new directions, we show that the nonlinear effects of the L1-ACH (a latent quadratic effect) and the interaction between gender and L1-ACH (an L1 × L1 latent interaction) are not significant. Although random-slope models show no significant school-to-school variation in relations between L1-ACH and L1-ASC, the negative effects of L2-ACH (the BFLPE) do vary somewhat with individual L1-ACH. We conclude with implications for diverse applications of the set of latent contextual models, including recommendations about their implementation, effect size estimates (and confidence intervals) appropriate to multilevel models, and directions for further research in contextual effect analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Positive psychology: An introduction.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5 · Cited by 11,351
Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue.
Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.2.121 · Cited by 4,462
Searle, S. R., Casella, G., & McCulloch, C. E. (1992) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316856 · Cited by 1,926
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Latent Interaction Effects with the LMS Method
Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296338 · Cited by 1,429
Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research
Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804564 · Cited by 1,146
Cited by
Academic self‐concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering
Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709910x503501 · Cited by 975
Self-citationAlternative methods for assessing mediation in multilevel data: The advantages of multilevel SEM
Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2011) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.557329 · Cited by 889
Khajavy, G. H., MacIntyre, P. D., & Barabadi, E. (2018) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263117000304 · Cited by 451
Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., Göllner, R., & Trautwein, U. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.05.006 · Cited by 435
Self-citationRelations between teachers’ emotional exhaustion and students’ educational outcomes.
Arens, A. K., & Morin, A. J. S. (2016) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000105 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Nagengast, B.
- Venue
- Multivariate Behavioral Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-11-30
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 764-802
- ISSN
- 0027-3171 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7906
- OpenAlex
- W2108998562
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.