Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Hypocrealean Fungi (Ascomycetes, Hypocreales)

Rogerson, Clark T.·1970·Mycologia

Abstract

SUMMARYA brief review of the taxonomic history of the order Hypocreales (Fungi, Ascomycetes) is presented. A modified characterization of the Hypocreales with one family, Hypocreaceae, and the acceptance and characterization of the Clavicipitales with one family, Clavicipitaceae, are given together with a key to the orders of the Ascomycetes subclass Ascomycetidae, and keys to the genera of the Hypocreales and the Clavicipitales. A total of 104 genera are tentatively maintained in the Hypocreales; 33 additional genera are indicated in synonymy. A total of 23 genera are included in the Clavicipitales, an additional 8 are indicated in synonymy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00275514.1970.12019033

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Rogerson, C. T.
Venue
Mycologia
Published
1970-09
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
865-910
ISSN
  • 0027-5514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-2536
OpenAlex
W2032054414
Cited by
159
References
0
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Hypocrealean Fungi (Ascomycetes, Hypocreales). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00275514.1970.12019033
The paper
Rogerson, C. T. (1970). The Hypocrealean Fungi (Ascomycetes, Hypocreales). Mycologia. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1970.12019033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.