Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Association of morphology and mycotoxin production with vegetative compatibility groups in Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus , and A. tamarii

Horn, B. W., Greene, R. L., Sobolev, V. S., Dorner, J. W., Powell, J. H., Layton, R. C.·1996·Mycologia

Abstract

Vegetative compatibility groups within populations of Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, and A. tamarii from soil and peanut seeds in a peanut field were examined for differences in morphology (colony color and Sclerotium characters) and mycotoxin production (aflatoxins, cyclopiazonic acid, and kojic acid). Aspergillus tamarii was divided into types A and B based on morphological differences and the lack of vegetative compatibility between the two types. Using digital color image processing, the four taxa were easily distinguished by colony color through analyses of peak color intensities for red, green, and blue. Color comparisons of A. flavus vegetative compatibility groups were not possible because of poor sporulation by many of the isolates. Vegetative compatibility group 1 of A. parasiticus differed significantly from groups 2–9 in colony color, and groups 1–3 of A. tamarii type A and groups 1–3 of A. tamarii type B were also significantly different within each type. Color image processing of filtered conidia indicated that the color difference of A. parasiticus group 1 was due primarily to the flocculose texture of the colony whereas group differences in A. tamarii types A and B were the result of conidium pigmentation. Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus showed significant differences among groups in number of sclerotia, Sclerotium volume, and Sclerotium shape (length/width ratio). Isolates of A. tamarii type B often produced irregularly shaped sclerotia; type A isolates were nonsclerotial. Among the 11 groups of A. flavus, significant differences were detected in total aflatoxin (aflatoxins B1 + B2), cyclopiazonic acid, and kojic acid. Aspergillus parasiticus groups also showed significant differences in total aflatoxin (aflatoxins B1 + B2 + G1 + G2), ratio of G1 + G2/B1 + B2, and kojic acid; cyclopiazonic acid was not produced by A. parasiticus. Nonaflatoxigenic isolates of A. flavus and A. parasiticus were restricted to certain groups and in A. parasiticus, all nonaflatoxigenic isolates accumulated O-methylsterigmatocystin, an immediate precursor of aflatoxin B1. Isolates of A. tamarii type A produced cyclopiazonic acid and kojic acid whereas those of type B produced only kojic acid at concentrations six-fold higher than type A; few differences in mycotoxin production were detected among groups in the two types of A. tamarii. The high proportion of variation among isolates accounted for by vegetative compatibility groups suggests that isolates within groups are closely related.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00275514.1996.12026688

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Horn, B. W., Greene, R. L., Sobolev, V. S., Dorner, J. W., Powell, J. H., & Layton, R. C.
Venue
Mycologia
Published
1996-07
Volume
88
Issue
4
Pages
574-587
ISSN
  • 0027-5514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-2536
OpenAlex
W2324322881
Cited by
161
References
0
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of morphology and mycotoxin production with vegetative compatibility groups in Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus , and A. tamarii. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00275514.1996.12026688
The paper
Horn, B. W., Greene, R. L., Sobolev, V. S., Dorner, J. W., Powell, J. H., & Layton, R. C. (1996). Association of morphology and mycotoxin production with vegetative compatibility groups in Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus , and A. tamarii. Mycologia. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1996.12026688

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.