Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of wood decay among diverse lignicolous fungi

Worrall, James J., Anagnost, Susan E., Zabel, Robert A.·1997·Mycologia

Abstract

In decay tests with 98 isolates (78 species) of lignicolous fungi followed by chemical and anatomical analyses, the validity of the generally accepted, major decay types (white, brown, and soft rot) was confirmed, and no new major types proposed. We could distinguish soft rot from other decay types based on anatomical and chemical criteria, without reliance on cavities or recourse to taxonomy of causal agents. Chemically, soft rot of birch could be distinguished from white rot by lower Klason lignin loss, and from brown rot by much lower alkali solubility. Anatomically, erosion of birch fiber walls in soft rot was distinguished from that in white rot by the angular erosion channels, V-shaped notches and diamond-shaped, eroded pit apertures that predominated in the former and their rounded forms in the latter.Substantial decay was caused by fungi representing eight orders in addition to the Aphyllophorales. Members of the Exidiaceae generally caused low weight losses and anatomical and chemical patterns of degradation characteristic of white rot. Isolates of Auricularia auricula-judae also caused a white rot, with high weight losses and unusual, branching microcavities that were oriented longitudinally in the S2 cell-wall layer. Ten species of the Dacrymycetales caused a brown rot like that caused by some Aphyllophorales; most caused high weight losses.Among white-rot fungi on birch, a relationship was observed between strongly selective delignification and strongly selective utilization of mannose. Among brown-rot fungi on birch, the top two polyose sugars (not including glucose) in order of selectivity were galactose>mannose; among soft-rotters they were arabinose>xylose. On pine, distinctions were not so clear, but some differing trends were evident.Previously unreported selective delignifiers were found in the Auriculariales, Agaricales, and in two orders of gasteromycetes. Selective delignification was most pronounced at low weight losses. Certain decay features similar to those in the Ascomycota were found in the Auriculariales, consistent with hypotheses that place that order near the phylogenetic root of Basidiomycota. A sequence of origins of decay types is proposed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00275514.1997.12026772

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Worrall, J. J., Anagnost, S. E., & Zabel, R. A.
Venue
Mycologia
Published
1997-03
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
199-219
ISSN
  • 0027-5514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-2536
OpenAlex
W2074762490
Cited by
388
References
1
FWCI
26.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of wood decay among diverse lignicolous fungi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00275514.1997.12026772
The paper
Worrall, J. J., Anagnost, S. E., & Zabel, R. A. (1997). Comparison of wood decay among diverse lignicolous fungi. Mycologia. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1997.12026772

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.