The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phytoplankton distributions around New Zealand derived from SeaWiFS remotely‐sensed ocean colour data
Abstract
Ocean colour data from the NASA Sea‐viewing Wide Field‐of‐view Sensor (SeaWiFS) was used to estimate chlorophyll a concentration around New Zealand on a monthly basis between September 1997 and May 2000. The performance of the SeaWiFS chlorophyll a algorithm (OC4v4) was investigated by comparing in situ measurements of the underwater light field with measurements of phytoplankton pigment concentration by High Performance Liquid Chromatography. The algorithm performed well for chlorophyll a concentrations below 0.6 mg m‐3 but overestimated by a factor of two or more at higher concentrations. The average chlorophyll a concentration for New Zealand Exclusive Economic Zone was calculated as an indication of the overall productivity of the region and varied between 0.26 and 0.43 mg m‐3 with no obvious relationship to the Southern Oscillation Index. New Zealand northern subtropical and Tasman Sea waters had a classical cycle of spring and autumn chlorophyll blooms consistent with production being co‐limited by nitrate and light. Subantarctic waters had a low‐magnitude annual cycle of chlorophyll abundance that peaked in early autumn, consistent with production being predominantly limited by a combination of iron and light. Chlorophyll was generally highest in the Subtropical Front where subtropical and subantarctic waters mix. A series of persistent warm‐core eddies along New Zealand's east coast was obvious in many images, manifest as regions of low chlorophyll concentration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dower, K., & Lucas, M. (1993) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps095141 · Cited by 37
Cited by
Condie, S. A., & Dunn, J. R. (2006) · Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1071/mf06009 · Cited by 167
A meta-analysis on harmful algal bloom (HAB) detection and monitoring: a remote sensing perspective
Khan, R. M., Salehi, B., Mahdianpari, M., Mohammadimanesh, F., Mountrakis, G., & Quackenbush, L. J. (2021) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13214347 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, R. J., Pinkerton, M. H., Richardson, K. M., Bradford‐Grieve, J. M., & Boyd, P. W.
- Venue
- New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 343-362
- ISSN
- 0028-8330 (ISSN-L)
- 1175-8805
- OpenAlex
- W1982743330
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytoplankton distributions around New Zealand derived from SeaWiFS remotely‐sensed ocean colour data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00288330.2001.9517005
- The paper
- Murphy, R. J., Pinkerton, M. H., Richardson, K. M., Bradford‐Grieve, J. M., & Boyd, P. W. (2001). Phytoplankton distributions around New Zealand derived from SeaWiFS remotely‐sensed ocean colour data. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2001.9517005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.