Cited by 122Nuclear reactor physics and engineeringAdvanced Energy Technologies and Civil Engineering InnovationsSpacecraft Design and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kilopower Project: The KRUSTY Fission Power Experiment and Potential Missions

Open access

Abstract

The Kilopower Project was initiated by NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate/Game Changing Development Program in fiscal year 2015 to demonstrate subsystem-level technology readiness of small space fission power in a relevant environment (Technology Readiness Level 5) for space science and human exploration power needs. The Kilopower Project centerpiece is the Kilowatt Reactor Using Stirling TechnologY (KRUSTY) test, which consists of the development and testing of a ground technology demonstrator of a 1-kW(electric)–class fission power system (FPS). The technologies to be developed and validated by KRUSTY are extensible to space FPSs from 1 to 10 kW(electric), which can enable modular surface FPSs for human exploration as well as higher-power future potential deep space science missions. The KRUSTY demonstration is cofunded by NASA and the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration. The KRUSTY demonstration in the National Critical Experiment Research Center’s Device Assembly Facility was completed in the first quarter of 2018.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00295450.2020.1722554

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. M. A. RUCKER, “Integrated Surface Power Strategy for Mars,” Proc. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space, February 23–26, 2015, Albuquerque, New Mexico, p. 5074, American Nuclear Society (2015).
  2. L. S. MASON et al., “Versatile Stirling Technology for Radioisotope and Fission Power Systems,” Proc. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space, John C. Stennis Space Center, Mississippi, February 24–26, 2014, p. 1024, American Nuclear Society (2014).
  3. J. T. CREASY et al., “Fuel Selection and Development for Small Fission Power System,” Proc. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space, John C. Stennis Space Center, Mississippi, February 24–26, 2014, p. 2006, American Nuclear Society (2014).
  4. D. I. POSTON et al., “Notional Design of the Kilopower Space Reactor,” Proc. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space, John C. Stennis Space Center, Mississippi, February 24–26, 2014, p. 2007, American Nuclear Society (2014).
  5. M. A. GIBSON et al., “Development of NASA’s Small Fission Power System for Science and Human Exploration,” Proc. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space, John C. Stennis Space Center, Mississippi, February 24–26, 2014, p. 2015, American Nuclear Society (2014).
  6. P. R. McCLURE et al., “The Use of the Nevada National Security Site as a Reactor Test Center,” Proc. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space, John C. Stennis Space Center, Mississippi, February 24–26, 2014, p. 2016, American Nuclear Society (2014).
  7. D. I. POSTON et al., “Reactor Design of the Kilowatt Reactor Using Stirling Technology (KRUSTY),” Proc. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space, Huntsville, Alabama, February 22–25, 2016, p. 6090, American Nuclear Society (2016).
  8. D. I. POSTON et al., “Shielding Options for Kilopower Mars Surface Reactors,” Proc. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space, Huntsville, Alabama, February 22–25, 2016, p. 6089, American Nuclear Society (2016).
  9. D. T. PALAC et al., “Nuclear Systems Kilopower Update,” Proc. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space, Huntsville, Alabama, February 22–25, 2016, p. 6057, American Nuclear Society (2016).
  10. M. BRIGGS and M. A. GIBSON, “Status of the Kilowatt Reactor Using Stirling Technology (KRUSTY),” Proc. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space, Orlando, Florida, February 27–March 2, 2017, p. 21151 American Nuclear Society (2017).
  11. J. R. CASANI, “Space Fission Power: NASA’s Best Bet to Continue to Explore the Outer Solar System,” Proc. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space, Richland, Washington, February 25–28, 2019, American Nuclear Society (2019).
  12. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, New Frontiers in the Solar System: An Integrated Exploration Strategy, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. (2003).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 122

Metadata

Authors
McClure, P. R., Poston, D. I., Gibson, M. A., Mason, L. S., & Robinson, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
  • Glenn Research Center (US)
  • Y-12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Corresponding author
McClure, Patrick R.
Venue
Nuclear Technology
Published
2020-06-04
Volume
206
Issue
sup1
ISSN
  • 0029-5450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7471
OpenAlex
W3033505500
Cited by
122
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 3
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nuclear Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • National Nuclear Security Administration
  • Space Technology Mission Directorate
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Nuclear Energy and Engineering › Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Nuclear Energy and Engineering › Advanced Energy Technologies and Civil Engineering Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
Keywords
Stirling engine, space nuclear propulsion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review