The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Individual and Community Aspects of Women's Status and Fertility in Rural Bangladesh
Abstract
This paper examines the relationship between women's status and fertility in two regions of rural Bangladesh. Based on individual and household-level survey data, women's status is measured through four constructs. The covariates of these four aspects of women's status vary considerably and confirm the view that women's status is conceptually and operationally complex. For all aspects, however, variation between villages accounts for the largest share of explainable variance. Proxy measures of status do not provide uniform relationships with all facets of status. Further, the paper shows that women's status is an important determinant of fertility; of the variance in total children ever born that can be explained by factors other than age, nearly 30 per cent is due to direct measures of women's status; this is as much as can be explained by all other socio-economic variables combined. Thus, models of fertility that rely solely on proxy measures of women's status will be underspecified. In addition, measurement of women's status that does not account for the bias that women's status and fertility are simultaneously determined in patriarchal societies will misstate the direction, and underestimate the effects, of status on fertility. Lastly, different dimensions of women's status influence fertility differently – in terms of magnitude, direction and statistical significance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Women’s status and domestic violence in rural Bangladesh: Individual- and community-level effects
Koenig, M. A., Ahmed, S., Hossain, M. B., & Mozumder, A. B. M. K. A. (2003) · Demography · doi:10.1353/dem.2003.0014 · Cited by 736
Schuler, S. R., Hashemi, S. M., & Riley, A. P. (1997) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(96)00119-2 · Cited by 300
Stevenson, E. G. J., Greene, L. E., Maes, K. C., Ambelu, A., Tesfaye, Y. A., Rheingans, R., & Hadley, C. (2012) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.022 · Cited by 270
“The questionnaire also addressed food insecurity (Swindwale & Bilinksy, 2006); demographic characteristics of the household, including landholding and livestock assets; and division of labor and household decision-making (adapted from Balk, 1994).”
Defying Gender Norms in Rural Bangladesh: A Social Demographic Analysis
Balk, D. (1997) · Population Studies · doi:10.1080/0032472031000149886 · Cited by 121
Self-citationGender inequality, family planning, and maternal and child care in a rural Chinese county
Li, J. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.041 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Balk, D.
- Venue
- Population Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-45
- ISSN
- 0032-4728 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4747
- OpenAlex
- W2061790416
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual and Community Aspects of Women's Status and Fertility in Rural Bangladesh. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0032472031000147456
- The paper
- Balk, D. (1994). Individual and Community Aspects of Women's Status and Fertility in Rural Bangladesh. Population Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000147456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.