Differential Diagnosis of Altered Mind/Body Perception
Abstract
Considerable confusion exists in the psychiatric literature concerned with states of consciousness in which there is an altered perception of the mind/body relationship; related but different terms are often used interchangeably, with a lack of definitional rigor. The purpose of this paper is to bring clarity to this group of related phenomena by differentiating out-of-body experience (OBE) from depersonalization, autoscopic phenomena and schizophrenic body distortions (such as boundary loss), which are the principal entities with which the syndrome may be confused. The problem of variable definition of the syndromes is compounded by the fact that some studies deal with psychiatric or medical patients, others focus on nonpatients, and still others deal with both groups. The fact that some groups of persons with experiences of altered mind/body perception do not define themselves as patients, do not seek treatment, and may not need treatment underscores the need for clarification. Following an explication of the different syndromes and their characteristics, we will briefly consider treatment implications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There were no significant differences between clinical and non-clinical groups regarding current religious affiliation.
“There were no significant differences between clinical and non-clinical groups regarding current religious affiliation55 or sex.45”
Other studies found a higher anxiety level in non-clinical groups with anomalous/spiritual experiences.
“Conversely, other studies found a higher anxiety level in non-clinical groups with anomalous/spiritual experiences.55,64”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 23 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Gabbard, G. O., Twemlow, S. W., & Jones, F. C.
- Venue
- Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1982-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 361-369
- ISSN
- 0033-2747 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-281X
- OpenAlex
- W1584166437
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- out-of-body experiences, depersonalization, boundary loss, states of consciousness, differential diagnosis, psychiatric syndromes, therapeutic implications
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Image, Child, Cognition Disorders, Consciousness Disorders, Depersonalization, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Reality Testing, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review