Cited by 54Corporeality, Perception, and EducationPhysical Education and PedagogyFoucault, Power, and Ethics

Rendering the Body: The Implicit Lessons of Gross Anatomy

Pronger, Brian·1995·Quest

Abstract

This paper explores the role played by gross anatomy courses in university physical education curricula in developing objectifying attitudes toward the body in professional physical education practices. Calling on postmodern analyses of the politics of knowledge and the production of bodies, it is argued that students' experiences of the gross anatomy laboratory is actually an educational rite of passage in coming to see the body as a mechanical object, a useful resource in the production of physical capital. This professional attitude toward the body contributes to the abuse of the body in consumer culture, high performance sport, and the production of gendered bodies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00336297.1995.10484168

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The natural scientific viewpoint treats the body as a technological object to be trained and perfected.

    “a technological object to be trained and perfected (Pronger, 1995)”

    From Pedagogies of embodiment in physical education – a literature review (2022) · cites this paper as Pronger, 1995

  • The traditional way of understanding and theorizing the body in physical education is heavily influenced by the natural sciences.

    “With certain historical exceptions, the traditional way of understanding and theorizing the body in the area of physical education is heavily influenced by the natural sciences (Pronger, 1995).”

    From Pedagogies of embodiment in physical education – a literature review (2022) · cites this paper as Pronger, 1995

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pronger, B.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Pronger, Brian
Venue
Quest
Published
1995-11
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
427-446
ISSN
  • 0033-6297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2750
OpenAlex
W1978984402
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
70.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Quest (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Corporeality, Perception, and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
Keywords
gross anatomy, physical education curriculum, body objectification, body politics, physical capital, gendered bodies, consumerism, elite sport, anatomy laboratory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review