Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The resistivity recovery of high purity and carbon doped iron following low temperature electron irradiation

Takaki, S., Fuss, J., Kuglers, H., Dedek, U., Schultz, H.·1983·Radiation Effects

Abstract

High purity iron (residual resistance ratio ∼5000) and similar iron doped with carbon (15 at. ppm and 67 at.ppm) have been irradiated with 3 MeV electrons at low temperatures. The resistivity recovery of these specimens has been investigated in some detail. The results allow the following interpretations: Two recovery stages, Stage I E (120–140 K) and Stage III (220–278 K), are related to free migration of elementary atomic defects. Other, secondary recovery stages related to long-range defect migration, appeared at 164–185 K, and at 340–360 K, the latter is due to the motion of interstitial carbon atoms. The Stage I E defect and the Stage III defect, both react with carbon. The binding enthalpy for the I E defect-carbon complex is 0.11 eV, for the Stage III defect-carbon ∼1.1 eV. The specific defect resistivity of the Stage II defect-carbon complex is distinctly lower than that of the Stage I E defect-carbon complex. We ascribe the Stage I E defect as an interstitial atom and the Stage III defect as a monovacancy. The secondary long-range migration at 164–185 K can be explained by the migration of di-interstitials. No support for long-range migration of an elementary atomic defect at 520 K could be obtained. These interpretations are in conflict with predictions, derived from high temperature equilibrium observations. Other informations and possible reasons for these discrepancies are discussed. The clue for the understanding of the defect reactions between 220 K and 560 K in carbon doped iron in terms of vacancy migration at 220 K can be seen in the fact that a monovacancy can attract more than one carbon atom, but will be saturated with a distinct small number (e.g. n=6). This has been also emphasized by other authors. The 3 dominant defect reactions in this temperature range are then: at 220 K the formation of monovacancy-carbon complexes by vacancy migration, at 350 K the formation of multiple carbon-vacancy complexes by carbon migration and at 560 K the break-up of these clusters. If this interpretation is true, this sequence of defect reactions should have a wider range of application for example, interstitial solutes in vanadium, niobium and tantalum.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00337578308207398

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Takaki, S., Fuss, J., Kuglers, H., Dedek, U., & Schultz, H.
Venue
Radiation Effects
Published
1983-01
Volume
79
Issue
1-4
Pages
87-122
ISSN
0033-7579 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030356163
Cited by
315
References
0
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The resistivity recovery of high purity and carbon doped iron following low temperature electron irradiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00337578308207398
The paper
Takaki, S., Fuss, J., Kuglers, H., Dedek, U., & Schultz, H. (1983). The resistivity recovery of high purity and carbon doped iron following low temperature electron irradiation. Radiation Effects. https://doi.org/10.1080/00337578308207398

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.