The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collective Knowledge Communication and Innovation: The Evidence of Technological Districts
Abstract
ANTONELLI C. (2000) Collective knowledge communication and innovation: the evidence of technological districts, Reg. Studies 34 , 535-547. Technological knowledge is a collective good in that its generation is the result of a process that combines pieces of information and knowledge that are owned by a variety of parties and cannot be traded as such. With low transaction and communication costs technological externalities can fully deploy their effects in terms of increasing returns and positive feedbacks. The conditions and features of communication processes explain the clustering of innovations in well de ned regional spaces. Localization in technological districts featured by multichannel communications systems favours access to external knowledge, now viewed as an essential intermediary input in the generation of technological knowledge, and encourages the introduction of localized technological changes, leading to self-reinforcing mechanisms based upon localized increasing returns. ANTONELLI C. (2000) La transmission de la connaissance collective et l'innovation: des preuves provenant des districts technologiques: Reg. Studies 34 , 535-547. La connaisasance technologique est un bien collectif dans la mesure où elle résulte d'un processus qui allie des renseignements et des connaissances possédés en copropriété qui ne peuvent pas être échangés en tant que telle. Etant donné les coûts des transactions et de la communication peu élevés, les effets externes puissent se déployer entièrement en termes de leurs rendements accroissants et de leurs retombées positives. Les conditions et les caractéristiques des processus de communication expliquent le regroupement des innovations dans des espaces régionaux bien délimités. L'implantation dans des districts technologiques caractérisés par des systèmes de communication à plusieurs chaînes, favorise l'accès à la connaissance externe, considéré de nos jours comme un facteur intermédiaire indispensablè a la connaissance technologique, et encourage l'introduction des transformations technologiques localisées, ce qui entraîne des mécanismes de renforcement autonomes basés sur des rendements accroissants localisés. ANTONELLI C. (2000) Kollektive Wissensvermittlung und Innovation: Beweismaterial technologischer Gebiete, Reg. Studies 34 , 535‐547. Technologisches Wissen ist ein Gemeingut insofern als seine Schaffung das Ergebnis eines Prozesses darstellt, in dem Einzelinformations- und Wissensbrocken zusammengefügt werden, dievon vielerlei Gruppen stammen und als solche gehandelt werden können. Dank niedriger Geschäfts-und Kommunikationskosten können externe technologische Faktoren ihre Wirkungen angesichts zunehmendem Profits und positiver Rückinformationen voll einsetzen. Die Bedingungen und Merkmale von Kommunikationsprozessen erklären die Häufung von Innovationen in genau umschriebenen regionalen Räumen. Örtliche Begrenzung in technologischen Distrikten, die in Mehrfachkanalsystemen für Kommunikation vorkommen, begünstigen den Zugang zu Außenwissen, das jetzt in der Generation tcchnologischen Wissens als wesentlicher Vermittlungsaufwand angesehen wird, und fördert die Einführung örtlich begrenzten technologischen Wandels, der zu einem sich selbst verstärkenden, örtlich begrenztem, auf zunehmendem Profit beruhenden Mechanismus führt.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure
Samuelson, P. A. (1954) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1925895 · Cited by 7,458
(1993) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195076165.001.0001 · Cited by 3,069
Storper, M. (1995) · European Urban and Regional Studies · doi:10.1177/096977649500200301 · Cited by 1,595
The Economics of Imperfect Knowledge: Collected Papers of G.B. Richardson
Richardson, G. B. (1998) · doi:10.4337/9781782542872 · Cited by 48
Cited by
Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography
Howells, J. R. L. (2002) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1080/00420980220128354 · Cited by 773
Balland, P.-A. (2012) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.529121 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Antonelli, C.
- Venue
- Regional Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 535-547
- ISSN
- 0034-3404 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0591
- OpenAlex
- W2163901612
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 18.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collective Knowledge Communication and Innovation: The Evidence of Technological Districts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00343400050085657
- The paper
- Antonelli, C. (2000). Collective Knowledge Communication and Innovation: The Evidence of Technological Districts. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400050085657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.