Cited by 36Social and Economic SolidaritySocial Sciences and GovernanceOrganic Food and Agriculture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Turning values concrete: the role and ways of business selection in local currency schemes

Open access
Blanc, Jérôme, Fare, Marie·2016·Review of Social Economy

Abstract

Alternative consumption schemes require the selection of producers and traders according to criteria and through processes that should make alternative values concrete. The way values turn concrete is crucial for the effectiveness of such projects. This paper investigates the ways criteria and processes are defined and their real meanings and uses through the case of associative local currencies. Drawing on the framework of proximities, it analyses local currency schemes as combining proximities (geographical and non-geographical) and selection processes set up for providers wishing to join. Selection processes may be based on a charter, an approval committee and screening criteria. The objectives of the selection, its measures in principle, the way in which it is applied as well as the practical consequences are discussed. Even when charters and formal participatory schemes for selecting providers are established, proximities appear as the keystone of selection and trust.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00346764.2016.1168035

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Blanc J., 2011, International Journal of Complementary Currency Research, 15, 4
  2. Fare M., 2011, International Journal of Complementary Currency Research, 15, 57
  3. Fare M., 2015, International Journal of Community Currency Research, 19, 6
  4. Gelleri C., 2009, International Journal of Complementary Currency Research, 13, 61
  5. Godschalk H., 2012, International Journal of Community Currency Research, 16, 58
  6. Ingham G., 2004, The Nature of Money
  7. Jacob J., 2004, International Journal of Complementary Currency Research, 8, 29
  8. North P., 2010, Local Money
  9. Pecqueur B., 2008, Développement local, gouvernance territoriale: enjeux et perspectives, 11
  10. Ryan-Collins J., 2011, International Journal of Complementary Currency Research, 15, 61
  11. Théret B., 2007, La monnaie dévoilée par ses crises
  12. Thiel C., 2012, International Journal of Complementary Currency Research, 16, 91
  13. Volkmann K., 2012, International Journal of Complementary Currency Research, 16, 97

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 36

Metadata

Authors
Blanc, J., & Fare, M.
Affiliations
Université Lumière Lyon 2 (FR)
Corresponding author
Blanc, Jérôme
Venue
Review of Social Economy
Published
2016-05-17
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
298-319
ISSN
  • 0034-6764 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1162
OpenAlex
W2404620598
Cited by
36
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Review of Social Economy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Social Sciences and Governance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
Keywords
local currency, business selection, selection criteria, alternative consumption, proximity, trust, local economic development, screening criteria, alternative values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review