The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PRELIMINARY NOTE ON THE ANCIENT HUMAN SKULL-REMAINS FROM THE TRANSVAAL.
Abstract
Towards the end of the year 1913 Mr. F. W. FitzSimons, of the Port Elizabeth Museum, was shown the portion of the skull-cap herein described which had been unearthed in making an underground drain on the farm Kolonies Plaats, Boskop, in the Potchefstroom district of the Transvaal.He recognised it as a human relic, and proceeded to make further excavations on the site.A year later further excavations were made by officers of the South African Museum and the Port Elizabeth Museum aided by a .grantfrom the Royal Society of South Africa, but the results obtained were very poor.The remains found consist of a large portion of a calvaria, the horizontal portion of the left ramus of the mandible, the major portion of .a. temporal bone, and some fragmentary limb-bones.It is intended that these remains shall be described more fully later; but in view of notices of .a. misleading character which have already appeared in print, it has been thought advisable to publish a preliminary note with a few details.For permission to do this, I have to thank Dr. Peringuey, the
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Younger Gravels at the main site are thought to be late Pliocene to Lower Pleistocene in age, 3 corroborated by recent cosmogenic nuclide burial ages ranging from 1.89±0.19Ma to 1.26±0.10Ma for the Younger Gravels at Windsorton.”
From Canteen Kopje: A new look at an old skull (2012) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“The gravels are overlain by 0.2 m -5.0 m of reddish sand known as the Hutton Sands (Stratum 1).”
From Canteen Kopje: A new look at an old skull (2012) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“They are thinnest in the distal part of the gravel units and increase in thickness in the lee of the gravel splay.3”
From Canteen Kopje: A new look at an old skull (2012) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“The Hutton Sands cover the Vaal Gravels throughout the CK locality but vary greatly in thickness.”
From Canteen Kopje: A new look at an old skull (2012) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The characteristics of the skull of the Boskop physical type
Galloway, A. (1937) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330230105 · Cited by 34
Boskop Remains from the South-east African Coast
DART, R. A. (1923) · Nature · doi:10.1038/112623a0 · Cited by 25
Late Stone Age and Middle Stone Age Tool-Makers
Wells, L. H. (1972) · The South African Archaeological Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3888812 · Cited by 21
Pycraft, W. P. (1925) · The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland · doi:10.2307/2843700 · Cited by 20
Canteen Kopje: A new look at an old skull
Smith, P., Nshimirimana, R., De Beer, F., Morris, D., Jacobson, L., Chazan, M., & Horwitz, L. K. (2012) · South African Journal of Science · doi:10.4102/sajs.v108i1/2.738 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Haughton, S. H., Thomson, R. B., & Péringuey, L.
- Venue
- Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1917-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 0035-919X (ISSN-L)
- 2154-0098
- OpenAlex
- W2061671465
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 9 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
- Keywords
- calvaria, mandible, temporal bone, limb bones, human fossils, Transvaal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
