Reducing Psychological Distress in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease by Cognitive-Behavioural Treatment: Exploratory Study of Effectiveness
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This prospective study aimed to determine whether cognitive-behavioural group treatment accompanying medical standard care is effective in reducing psychological distress in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: Twenty-eight outpatients with Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis completed the treatment programme. Psychological treatment consisting of 12 weekly sessions was conducted in a group setting. Medical and psychometric assessments were taken at the beginning of the 3-month pretreatment waiting period, at pretreatment, at post-treatment and at the 3, 6 and 9-month follow-ups. RESULTS: During baseline, no change was observed in psychological distress. Disease-related worries and concerns decreased significantly from pretreatment to the follow-ups. The disease groups differed in the decline of concerns between pre- and post-treatment, with a significant reduction of concerns in patients with ulcerative colitis but not Crohn disease. This difference did not occur at the follow-ups, indicating long-term improvement for both disease groups. Depressive coping decreased significantly in women and remained stable at the follow-ups, whereas depressive coping did not change in men. The same gender difference was found for depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The exploratory findings suggest that psychological group treatment for outpatients is a feasible and effective approach for the short- and long-term reduction of psychological distress for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, the revealed gender differences on coping and depression might indicate the necessity to consider gender-specific aspects of inflammatory bowel disease when designing and evaluating psychological interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multi-faceted programmes that included relaxation, coping or problem-solving elements found no improvement in distress but sustained improvement in disease-specific stress.
“Multi‐faceted programmes that included relaxation, coping or problem‐solving elements found no improvement in distress 35 , 51 but sustained improvement in disease‐specific stress. 51”
From Systematic review: the role of psychological stress in inflammatory bowel disease (2022) · cites this paper as [51]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- M., M., U., B., N., N., R., O., & V., S. M.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 755-762
- ISSN
- 0036-5521 (ISSN-L)
- 1502-7708
- OpenAlex
- W1976333100
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, psychological distress, cognitive behavioral therapy, group therapy, depressive symptoms, depressive coping, gender differences, long-term treatment outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Colitis, Ulcerative, Crohn Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psychotherapy, Group, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Program Evaluation, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review