Cited by 31Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsAortic Thrombus and EmbolismHealthcare Systems and Public Health

Fatal colonic ischaemia: A population-based study

Acosta, Stefan, Ögren, Mats, Sternby, Nils-Herman, Bergqvist, David, Björck, Martin·2006·Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence of fatal colonic ischaemia (CI) and the cause-specific mortality of CI, and to describe the localization and extension of colonic infarction and quantify the risk factors associated with CI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1970 and 1982 the autopsy rate in Malmö, Sweden, was 87%, creating the possibilities for a population-based study. Out of 23,446 clinical autopsies, 997 cases were coded for intestinal ischaemia in a database. In addition, 7569 forensic autopsy protocols were analysed. In a case-control study nested in the clinical autopsy cohort, four CI-free controls, matched for gender, age at death and year of death, were identified for each fatal CI case in order to evaluate the risk factors. RESULTS: The cause-specific mortality ratio was 1.7/1000 autopsies. The overall incidence of autopsy-verified fatal CI was 1.7/100,000 person years, increasing with age up to 23/100,000 person years in octogenarians. Fatal cardiac failure (odds ratio (OR) 5.2), fatal valvular disease (OR 4.3), previous stroke (OR 2.5) and recent surgery (OR 3.4) were risk factors for fatal CI. Narrowing/occlusion of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) at the aortic origin was present in 68% of the patients. The most common segments affected by transmural infarctions were the sigmoid (83%) and the descending (77%) colon. CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure, atherosclerotic occlusion/stenoses of the IMA and recent surgery were the main risk factors causing colonic hypoperfusion and infarction. Segments of transmural infarctions were observed within the left colon in 94% of the patients. Awareness of the diagnosis and its associated cardiac comorbidities might help to improve survival.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00365520600670042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 31

Authors
Acosta, S., Ögren, M., Sternby, N.-H., Bergqvist, D., & Björck, M.
Affiliations
  • Skåne University Hospital (SE)
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Acosta, Stefan
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2006-01
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
1312-1319
ISSN
  • 0036-5521 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-7708
OpenAlex
W2100548869
Cited by
31
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Thrombus and Embolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Keywords
colonic infarction, incidence, cause-specific mortality, risk factors, inferior mesenteric artery occlusion, heart failure, valvular heart disease, stroke, recent surgery, sigmoid colon, descending colon, transmural infarction, autopsy findings
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Autopsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sweden, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Case-Control Studies, Colitis, Ischemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review