Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Radiofrequency ablation versus ethanol injection for early hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized controlled trial

Brunello, Franco, Veltri, Andrea, Carucci, Patrizia, Pagano, Eva, Ciccone, Giovannino, Moretto, Paolo, Sacchetto, Paola, Gandini, Giovanni, Rizzetto, Mario·2008·Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), the standard approach which has been used for many years to treat early non-surgical hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), which has become an interesting alternative. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized trial was carried out on 139 cirrhotic patients in Child-Pugh classes A/B with 1-3 nodes of HCC (diameter 15-30 mm), for a total of 177 lesions. Patients were randomized to receive RFA (n=70) or PEI (n=69). The primary end-point was complete response (CR) 1 year after the percutaneous ablation of all HCC nodes identified at baseline. Secondary end-points were: early (30-50 days) CR, complications, survival and costs. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, 1-year CR was achieved in 46/70 (65.7%) and in 25/69 (36.2%) patients treated by RFA and PEI, respectively (p=0.0005). For lesions >20 mm in diameter, there was a larger CR rate in the RFA group (68.1% versus 26.3%). An early CR was obtained in 67/70 (95.7%) patients treated by RFA compared with 42/64 (65.6%) patients treated by PEI (p=0.0001). Complications occurred in 10 and 12 patients treated by RFA and PEI, respectively. The overall survival rate was not significantly different in the RFA versus PEI arm (adjusted hazard ratio=0.88, 95% CI: 0.50-1.53). There was an incremental health-care cost of 8286 euro for each additional patient successfully treated by RFA. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year CR rate after percutaneous treatment of early HCC was significantly better with RFA than with PEI but did not provide a clear survival advantage in cirrhotic patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00365520701885481

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Brunello, F., Veltri, A., Carucci, P., Pagano, E., Ciccone, G., Moretto, P., Sacchetto, P., Gandini, G., & Rizzetto, M.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2008-01
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
727-735
ISSN
  • 0036-5521 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-7708
OpenAlex
W1999426782
Cited by
302
References
22
FWCI
14.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiofrequency ablation versus ethanol injection for early hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00365520701885481
The paper
Brunello, F., Veltri, A., Carucci, P., Pagano, E., Ciccone, G., Moretto, P., Sacchetto, P., Gandini, G., & Rizzetto, M. (2008). Radiofrequency ablation versus ethanol injection for early hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365520701885481

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.