Cited by 43Gastrointestinal motility and disordersHealth, psychology, and well-beingPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The Sense of Coherence Index and the Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Comparison among Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients with and without Coexisting Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome Non-Patients, and Controls

A. D. Sperber, S. Carmel, Y. Atzmon·1999·Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background Sense of Coherence (SOC) is a global orientation that affects coping with stressors. A strong SOC is associated with better health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate SOC among patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and matched controls. Methods Seventy-nine IBS patients and 72 matched controls completed questionnaires and were tested for fibromyalgia (FS). The controls were subdivided into healthy controls (n = 49) or IBS non-patients (n = 23), and the patients into IBS only (n = 54) or IBS and FS (n = 25). Results The mean SOC score was higher for the controls than for the IBS patients (65.7+/-1.2 and 59.6+/-1.1, respectively; P = 0.003). There was no significant difference between the healthy controls and the IBS non-patients. The controls had a higher SOC than patients with IBS only and patients with IBS and FS (P = 0.0004). Conclusions An association was found between IBS and SOC. No causality can be inferred from this study. Individuals with low SOC may be more likely to express symptoms in terms of psychologic distress and increased health care utilization because of poor coping skills. Conversely, the presence of IBS may affect SOC negatively. Further longitudinal studies could clarify the potential of SOC as a predictor variable (for example, for treatment results) or an outcome variable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00365529950173654

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same pattern of more severe disorders in patients with both IBS and FMS than in those with IBS only held true for the Sense of Coherence Index and the Functional Bowel Disorder Severity Index.

    “The same pattern held true for the Sense of Coherence Index (a measure of coping ability)29 and the Functional Bowel Disorder Severity Index.30”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 17 · Cited by 43

Authors
A. D. Sperber, S. C.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
1999-01
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
259-263
ISSN
  • 0036-5521 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-7708
OpenAlex
W2168681671
Cited by
43
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
sense of coherence, irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, comorbidities, psychological distress, coping, health care utilization, chronic pain
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Colonic Diseases, Functional, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review