The Sense of Coherence Index and the Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Comparison among Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients with and without Coexisting Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome Non-Patients, and Controls
Abstract
Background Sense of Coherence (SOC) is a global orientation that affects coping with stressors. A strong SOC is associated with better health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate SOC among patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and matched controls. Methods Seventy-nine IBS patients and 72 matched controls completed questionnaires and were tested for fibromyalgia (FS). The controls were subdivided into healthy controls (n = 49) or IBS non-patients (n = 23), and the patients into IBS only (n = 54) or IBS and FS (n = 25). Results The mean SOC score was higher for the controls than for the IBS patients (65.7+/-1.2 and 59.6+/-1.1, respectively; P = 0.003). There was no significant difference between the healthy controls and the IBS non-patients. The controls had a higher SOC than patients with IBS only and patients with IBS and FS (P = 0.0004). Conclusions An association was found between IBS and SOC. No causality can be inferred from this study. Individuals with low SOC may be more likely to express symptoms in terms of psychologic distress and increased health care utilization because of poor coping skills. Conversely, the presence of IBS may affect SOC negatively. Further longitudinal studies could clarify the potential of SOC as a predictor variable (for example, for treatment results) or an outcome variable.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The same pattern of more severe disorders in patients with both IBS and FMS than in those with IBS only held true for the Sense of Coherence Index and the Functional Bowel Disorder Severity Index.
“The same pattern held true for the Sense of Coherence Index (a measure of coping ability)29 and the Functional Bowel Disorder Severity Index.30”
From Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Co-morbid Gastrointestinal and Extra-gastrointestinal Functional Syndromes (2010) · cites this paper as [29]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 17 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- A. D. Sperber, S. C.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-263
- ISSN
- 0036-5521 (ISSN-L)
- 1502-7708
- OpenAlex
- W2168681671
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- sense of coherence, irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, comorbidities, psychological distress, coping, health care utilization, chronic pain
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Colonic Diseases, Functional, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review