Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 14Educator Training and Historical PedagogyValues and Moral EducationLiteracy, Media, and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Discussing Cyber Ethics with Students Is Critical

Kruger, Robert·2003·The Social Studies

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00377990309600204

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Kruger, R.
Corresponding author
Kruger, Robert
Venue
The Social Studies
Published
2003-07
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
188-189
ISSN
  • 0037-7996 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-405X
OpenAlex
W1964965420
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Social Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Values and Moral Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
cyber ethics, digital citizenship, social studies education, teacher ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.