The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of organic matter and chemical fertilizers on the degradation of benthiocarb and mcpa herbicides in the soil
Abstract
The degradation of herbicides in soils amended with rice straw, compost and NPK chemical fertilizers was investigated in the laboratory under upland, oxidative-flooded (aerobic-flooded) and reductive-flooded (anaerobic-flooded) conditions using 14C-benthiocarb and 14C-MCPA labelled at the phenyl ring. Rice straw, compost and NPK amendments promoted the degradation of these herbicides under upland and oxidative-flooded conditions and large amounts of 14CO2 were evolved. Under reductive-flooded conditions, the degradation of the herbicides was remarkably slow and the various soil amendments had practically no effect on the degradation of the two herbicides. 4-Chlorobenzoic acid, desethylbenthiocarb, benthiocarb sulfoxide and 4-chlorobenzyl methyl sulfone were found to be the major degradation products of benthiocarb. Rice straw amendments appeared to increase the amount of benthiocarb sulfoxide but the amount of desethylbenthiocarb was reduced by both rice straw and compost, especially under upland conditions. 4-Chloro-2-methylphenol, which was the major degradation product of MCPA, was produced in relatively large amounts in the rice straw amendment under oxidative-flooded conditions and in the NPK amendment under upland conditions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Further studies report an increased degradation of pesticides under different agricultural situations in straw-amended soils (Duah-Yentumi and Kuwatsuka, 1980;Poll et al., 2010).”
From Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides (2021) · cites this paper as Duah-Yentumi and Kuwatsuka, 1980
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Bollag J.M., 1967, Appl. Microbiol., 15, 1393, 10.1128/AEM.15.6.1393-1398.1967 · DOI
- 10.1080/00380768.1974.10432607 · DOI
- 10.1021/jf60218a008 · DOI
- 10.1097/00010694-197806000-00002 · DOI
- 10.1584/jpestics.2.7 · DOI
- Oyama H., 1978, Fourth International Congress of Pesticide Chemistry (IUPAC), Zurich, July
- 10.1584/jpestics.5.495 · DOI
- Rankov V., 1977, Soil Biology and Conservation of the Biosphere, 74
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Siedt, M., Schäffer, A., Smith, K. E. C., Nabel, M., Roß-Nickoll, M., & van Dongen, J. T. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141607 · Cited by 563
Metadata
- Authors
- Duah-Yentumi, S., & Kuwatsuka, S.
- Affiliations
- Nagoya University (JP)
- Venue
- Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1980-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 541-549
- ISSN
- 0038-0768 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-0765
- OpenAlex
- W2110674702
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Science & Plant Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
- Keywords
- benthiocarb, MCPA, herbicide degradation, organic amendments, rice straw, compost, NPK fertilizer, flooded soil, upland soil, anaerobic conditions, oxidative conditions, 14C-labeled herbicide, degradation products, 4-chlorobenzoic acid, soil amendment effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review