The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Strategy or Alibi? Obama, McChrystal and the Operational Level of War
Abstract
Obama’s decision to dismiss McChrystal from his post as commander of ISAF in June 2010 has been interpreted as a clash at the interface of civil–military relations. But it has more profound underpinnings which reach into understandings of what strategy is and how it is made. Since the 1980s the armed forces both of the United States and its NATO allies have focused their intellectual attentions on the operational level of war. During the Cold War, the focus lay on the relationship between operations and tactics, not least because the Cold War itself defined the strategic context. After the end of the Cold War, the framework provided by strategy weakened, and the operational level of war assumed strategic significance, not least in the development of counter-insurgency theory. McChrystal’s behaviour is only the most obvious manifestation of the military frustrations that follow when strategy is unclear.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This means that presumed 'silver bullets' like 'strategic bombing', 'network-centric warfare' and also 'hybrid warfare' are not a strategy in themselves, but merely means to an end (Strachan 2010, p. 158-9).”
From Russia and ‘hybrid warfare’ (2016) · cites this paper as Strachan 2010
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Renz, B. (2016) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2016.1201316 · Cited by 156
“This means that presumed ‘silver bullets’ like ‘strategic bombing’, ‘network-centric warfare’ and also ‘hybrid warfare’ are not a strategy in themselves, but merely means to an end (Strachan, 2010, pp. 158–159).”
BackgroundParadoxes of Professionalism: Rethinking Civil-Military Relations in the United States
Brooks, R. A. (2020) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec_a_00374 · Cited by 153
In Search of the ‘X’ Factor: Morale and the Study of Strategy
Fennell, J. (2014) · Journal of Strategic Studies · doi:10.1080/01402390.2013.846856 · Cited by 41
Fault Lines of the American Military Profession
Crosbie, T. A., & Kleykamp, M. A. (2017) · Armed Forces & Society · doi:10.1177/0095327x17715437 · Cited by 40
Frock Coats against Brass Hats? Politicians, the Military and the War in Afghanistan 2001–2014
Dixon, P. (2019) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/pa/gsz015 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Strachan, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Strachan, Hew
- Venue
- Survival
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-09-29
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 157-182
- ISSN
- 0039-6338 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2699
- OpenAlex
- W2033678518
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Survival (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military History and Strategy
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military and Defense Studies
- Keywords
- operational level of war, civil-military relations, Obama administration, ISAF, counterinsurgency theory, military strategy, strategy making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
