The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Why Stepdown Procedures in Variable Selection
Abstract
Recent reviews have dealt with the subject of which variables to select and which to discard in multiple regression problems. Lindley (1968) emphasized that the method to be employed in any analysis should be related to the use intended for the finally fitted regression. In the report by Beale et al. (1967), the emphasis is on selecting the best subset for any specified number of retained independent variables. Here we will be concerned with pointing out the advantages of the variable selection scheme in which independent variables are successively discarded one at a time from the original full set. While these advantages are not unknown to workers in this field, they are however not appreciated by the statistical community in general. For the purposes of this demonstration it is assumed that we are in the nonsingular case so that the number of observations exceeds the number of regressor variables. Let us begin by considering economy of effort. Suppose that we were using a step-up regression procedure, ignoring for the while its theoretical deficiencies (to be discussed later). We should then first fit k simple regressions, one for each of the k regressor variables considered, selecting the single most significant individual regressor variable. Having made this selection we would proceed with k - 1 additional fits to determine which of the remaining variables in conjunction with the first selected yielded the greatest reduction in residual variation. This process is continued on so as to provide a successive selection and ordering of variables. We may even require the ordering of all k variables, leaving for later decision what critical juncture is to be employed in determining which of the k variables to retain, which to reject-if we do so we shall have made a total of k(k + 1)/2 fits, albeit they may have differed greatly in their degree of complexity. A complete stepdown regression procedure however requires but k fits, as will now be indicated. Suppose we have done a multiple regression on all k variables and wish to consider the k possible multiple regressions on all sets of k - 1 variables, that is where 1 variable has been deleted. The results for these k possible multiple regressions are implicit in the initial k-variable regression, provided we have secured the inverse matrix, or at least its diagonal, necessary for testing the significance of the fitted partial regression coefficients. The case
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Moons, K. G. M., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Macaskill, P., Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Ransohoff, D. F., & Collins, G. S. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-0698 · Cited by 5,147
Mallows, C. L. (1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1995.10484370 · Cited by 2,083
A Biometrics Invited Paper. The Analysis and Selection of Variables in Linear Regression
Hocking, R. R. (1976) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529336 · Cited by 1,765
Variable selection – A review and recommendations for the practicing statistician
Heinze, G., Wallisch, C., & Dunkler, D. (2018) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.201700067 · Cited by 1,639
A Baseline for the Multivariate Comparison of Resting-State Networks
Allen, E. A., Erhardt, E. B., Damaraju, E., Gruner, W., Segall, J. M., Silva, R. F., Havlicek, M., Rachakonda, S., Fries, J., Kalyanam, R., et al. (2011) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2011.00002 · Cited by 1,293
Metadata
- Authors
- Mantel, N.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1970-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 621-625
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2146094182
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Stepdown Procedures in Variable Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1970.10488701
- The paper
- Mantel, N. (1970). Why Stepdown Procedures in Variable Selection. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1970.10488701
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.