The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factorial Designs, the |X′X| Criterion, and Some Related Matters
Abstract
Two of the basic approaches to choosing an n-point experimental design in many industrial situations are (i) to set down a simple factorial or fractional factorial design in the factors being studied, or (ii) to choose a design based on the well-known |X′X| criterion. Experimenters often prefer (i) due to its simplicity; our viewpoint here is that (ii) is much better. We first indicate some situations for which (when all the factors are restricted to a cuboidal region) the factorial approach is optimal, as judged by the |X′X| criterion, but the assumed models are often not sensible ones in practical work. We then examine what (similarly restricted) designs are optimal under the |X′X| criterion for the standard linear models of first and second order; because of the very rapid increase in computational difficulties, we consider only “cube plus star” type designs for k ≥ 3 (except for k = 3, n = 10). In spite of computational requirements, we recommend use of the |X′X| criterion in general rather than the indiscriminate use of factorials and we briefly discuss the reasons why, both for linear and nonlinear model situations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Powell, M. J. D. (1964) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.2.155 · Cited by 4,632
Cited by
Wold, S., Ruhe, A., Wold, H., & Dunn, III (1984) · SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing · doi:10.1137/0905052 · Cited by 2,529
Khuri, A. I., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2010) · WIREs Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.73 · Cited by 2,113
DP-Optimality in Terms of Multiple Criteria and Its Application to the Split-Plot Design
Cao, Y., Wulff, S. S., & Robinson, T. J. (2017) · Journal of Quality Technology · doi:10.1080/00224065.2017.11918183 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Box, M. J., & Draper, N. R.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1971-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 731-742
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W1979349759
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factorial Designs, the |X′X| Criterion, and Some Related Matters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1971.10488845
- The paper
- Box, M. J., & Draper, N. R. (1971). Factorial Designs, the |X′X| Criterion, and Some Related Matters. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1971.10488845
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.