The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effect of Serial Correlation on the Performance of CUSUM Tests
Abstract
We employ the theory of weak convergence of cumulative sums to the Wiener Process to obtain large sample theory for cusum tests. These results provide at theoretical basis for studying the effects of serial correlation on the performance of the one-sided cusum test proposed by Page (1955). Particular attention is placed on the first, order auto-regressive and first order moving average models. In order to treat the sequential version of the test, we employ the same Wiener process approximation. This enables us to study the effect of correlation not only on the average run length but, more importantly, on the run length distribution itself. These theoretical distributions are shown to compare quite favorably with the true distribution on the basis of a Monte Carlo study using normal observations. The results on the changes in the shape of the run length distributions show that more than average run length should be considered. Our primary conclusion is that the cusum test is not robust with respect, to departures from independence. The use of cusum tests is now widespread and the presence of serial correlation common so that attention should be drawn to the seriousness of this lack of robustness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Theory of Stochastic Processes
Cox, D. R., Miller, H. D., Weiss, G., & Shuler, K. (1966) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3047872 · Cited by 3,324
Cited by
Detection of Abrupt Changes: Theory and Application
Riedel, K. S. (1994) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1994.10485821 · Cited by 3,518
Sequential Changepoint Detection in Quality Control and Dynamical Systems
Lai, T. L. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02052.x · Cited by 580
Confidence Interval Estimation Using Standardized Time Series
Schruben, L. (1983) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.31.6.1090 · Cited by 317
Leibman, M. J., Edgar, T. F., & Lasdon, L. S. (1992) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/0098-1354(92)80030-d · Cited by 258
Performance of CUSUM Control Schemes for Serially Correlated Observations
Yashchin, E. (1993) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269288 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, R. A., & Bagshaw, M.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1974-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-112
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2066446815
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Serial Correlation on the Performance of CUSUM Tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1974.10489155
- The paper
- Johnson, R. A., & Bagshaw, M. (1974). The Effect of Serial Correlation on the Performance of CUSUM Tests. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1974.10489155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.