Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 635

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Robust Method for Multiple Linear Regression

Andrews, D. F.·1974·Technometrics

Abstract

Techniques of fitting are said to be resistant when the result is not greatly altered in the case a small fraction of the data is altered: techniques of fitting are said to be robust of efficiency when their statistical efficiency remains high for conditions more realistic than the utopian cases of Gaussian distributions with errors of equal variance. These properties are particularly important in the formative stages of model building when the form of the response is not known exactly. Techniques with these properties are proposed and discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00401706.1974.10489233

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 635

Metadata

Authors
Andrews, D. F.
Venue
Technometrics
Published
1974-11
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
523-531
ISSN
  • 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2723
OpenAlex
W1967484865
Cited by
635
References
3
FWCI
14.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Robust Method for Multiple Linear Regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1974.10489233
The paper
Andrews, D. F. (1974). A Robust Method for Multiple Linear Regression. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1974.10489233

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.